www.theguardian.com
BY Punishing do you mean "applying the rules that were agreed". That's the problem with the language used in this country. You see some sort of punishment (I guess you don't but use that word to suit your agenda) I see an organisation complying to a treaty that was agreed by both sides. The UK are the ones not following the rules.
I dont think anyone is arguing with that Trug.
I think the use of the word "punish" would suggest you were. But fair enough it's just a wording thing.
They are protecting their borders, that's what trade blocks do, we wanted a trade block of one, that means we will face selling into every other country in the world....it's what we voted for apparently, but we hold all the cards with our oven ready deal and british exceptionalism.
exactly punish is a pejorative term and is out of context with the EU apply agreed rules. If the rules punish us, then we shouldn't have negotiated and signed up for those rules
Punish is exactly what they are doing. Are they right to do that? Absolutely we can't stick to an international treaty they have every right to start introducing sanctions.
That's it. It's not punishment. You said it yourself is sticking to a treaty. Maybe we shouldn't have agreed to the treaty if we were big to ignore it
Didn't I hear today that the damage done to the economy has already overtaken the amount of money we paid in membership fees?
Yet another senseless waste. Brexit is such a catastrophe at every single turn. Except for abused Australian sheep as we have established
This isn't punishing. It simply says the UK isn't part of the EU when it comes to requiring 30% of content to be EU content. This is in order to stop Netflix et al hitting European creative arts. We can join the EU if this upsets anyone.
