Bill Gates

RandySavage said:
What exactly is he up to?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world...ies-will-get-a-grade-for-coronavirus-response

Has recently been talking about a global vaccine program with low side effects, but wants indemnity before it's released to the government's around the world. Why indemnity? 👀☢️


How does a man with no specific medical or biological knowledge and training have such an influence on the medical world?
Click to expand...
I think he's just saying he'd want government(s) to accept the vaccine in their indemnity process. A link to the USA process :
Vaccine indemnity
 
Him asking for indemnity though is protecting him from any lawsuits.

If you look at his track record with vaccines in India and sub Saharan Africa then you can see why he wants that protection. 👀
 
He has long expressed an interest in epidemics and has even warned that a pandemic like Covid-19 was inevitable. He also sponsored a simulation pandemic only weeks before the outbreak in Wuhan. He seems to have his fingers everywhere, but there is something about his real motives that gives me cause for concern.
Plenty of articles on him at Global Research. https://www.globalresearch.ca/search?q=Bill+Gates+&x=0&y=0
 
RandySavage said:
Him asking for indemnity though is protecting him from any lawsuits.

If you look at his track record with vaccines in India and sub Saharan Africa then you can see why he wants that protection. 👀
Click to expand...
No. It's normal practice and the degree of testing will be nowhere near normal drug development which is why the USA may be reluctant to accept indemnity.
 
Gates (and many others) have been vocal about the possibility of pandemics for years but of course the cost - whilst not prohibitive based on the numbers they postulated - would not yield anything tangible to governments and unless an outbreak occurred would be seen as money for no gain. That is a shame, because the very same governments will stump up vast amounts of money for the most destructive of weapons which sit unused (thankfully)

If this pandemic acts as a wakeup call and we see investment in this area it could be a good thing. Personally, I doubt it as we humans (or at least the political leaders) appear too stupid to work together on a global basis for the good of all.
 
He has links to eugenics movements. In that interview he states he wants to "vaccinate" 7 billion people. Yes, we bet you do Bill :sneaky:
 
It's odd that on a Middlesbrough football message board a toplc can be started with an exBoro player's name and when you click on you can be surprised that it isn't about football, it's a topic about an American billionaire.
 
He's genuinely trying to make a difference. The problem is that he seems naive or indifferent to the way in which state actors control UN organizations. In part due to years of indifference on the part of US administrations.

Successive US administrations have been content to allow China to infiltrate a range of UN organizations, I suppose because they believed it would hasten China's joining the community of nations (or more likely because they were making money from China themselves). Unfortunately to China it was simply one of the "Unrestricted Warfare" techniques. And rather successful at that.
 
Facefuzz said:
In years to come Bill Gates will be remembered for being a bad man.
Click to expand...
Yeah it's horrible when someone spends hundreds of millions of his own money on charitable causes.

How dare he educate, feed and provide medicine for the people of Africa who can't afford it.

Naughty Bill. Naughty
 
SmallTown said:
Yeah it's horrible when someone spends hundreds of millions of his own money on charitable causes.

How dare he educate, feed and provide medicine for the people of Africa who can't afford it.

Naughty Bill. Naughty
Click to expand...

He has done alot. I'm just n
SmallTown said:
Yeah it's horrible when someone spends hundreds of millions of his own money on charitable causes.

How dare he educate, feed and provide medicine for the people of Africa who can't afford it.

Naughty Bill. Naughty
Click to expand...

He certainly does. His main aim of that to reduce world population, something I would like to see happen, but not everybody thinks it's a good idea.
He also , ive read, has links and funding in medicine companies that provide the medicine for his cause which I think is a bit fishy.
 
So he wants to reduce works population by educating people and providing them medicine?

How does this work?

Also, if you want to provide the developing world with cheap medicine, wouldn't you help companies provide it?

What am I missing here? He'd quite possibly the most charitable person in history if you look at total charitable spend.
 
There's a lot of people who have said that the likes of pop stars and other celebrities should stop taking part in events coercing us to put our money behind charitable causes and donate some of their own weath.

Gates has not only donated an astonishing amount of money via his foundation, but has managed to get some of the other wealthy men (such as Warren Buffet $37 billion) to do likewise.

I have read all the negative press he gets but can find no evidence that any of his work holds malice. Yes he has ties to drug companies, he is backing them to develop drugs for the poorest in the world through the foundation - there may be money to be made out of such drugs in the richer countries, but that is piped back into the foundation. Yes he has done 'scenario events' to see how the world would cope with a pandemic - that surely is the right thing to do and it should be governments doing it to test the response. Yes he wants a special team working on drugs, diseases, pandemics etc, who can be used as rapid response agency when we do have an outbreak - why is that wrong?

I just can't see why people discount him or worse discredit him when he seems to offer hope for so many in the poorest places on earth.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top