Carricks subs

T

TheWolfman

Well-known member
I didn't agree with them today. Felt like we went totally defensive too early. Would of put forss up top thought apart from the goal archer got bullied and couldn't get in the game. Definitely wouldn't have brought crooks on. Would have brought barlaser on for howson

I doubted him and was wrong. Did anyone else start to doubt him and feel daft today.

Glad hes the manager not me, brilliant as usual.
 
Last edited:
Ahhh, fair enough.

I definitely questioned taking off Archer for Fry, but I suppose there was a logic to it when we were under so much pressure in the second half.
 
I thought Fry was excellent when he came on, really dominant.

I didn’t understand the Forss one, unless he was totally out of gas. Isiah Jones offered nothing when he came on and just looked a liability to me.
 
Alexander Supertramp said:
I thought Fry was excellent when he came on, really dominant.

I didn’t understand the Forss one, unless he was totally out of gas. Isiah Jones offered nothing when he came on and just looked a liability to me.
Click to expand...
Agree fry was excellent. Jones wasted the ball and just needed to get in the corner or stretch them. Crooks did what he should have
 
I disagree he got them spot on. It worked out for us in the end though.

We could have changed things earlier to try and change the onslaught.

But the change on 85+ minutes itv crooks was the right one.

I don’t think we did the right thing between 50-85
 
A real mixed bag of a performance today as well as we played in the first half we were dreadful in the second. I didn't see that coming obviously they made some tactical adjustments at HT but we completely lost our composure and couldn't string two passes together until the late subs, I was quite disheartened by it really. Maybe he could have brought barlaser on after 60 and played 3 in the middle to get back control earlier. Well played to crooks who always seems to come on get a grip on the game
 
Glover_elbow said:
A real mixed bag of a performance today as well as we played in the first half we were dreadful in the second. I didn't see that coming obviously they made some tactical adjustments at HT but we completely lost our composure and couldn't string two passes together until the late subs, I was quite disheartened by it really. Maybe he could have brought barlaser on after 60 and played 3 in the middle to get back control earlier. Well played to crooks who always seems to come on get a grip on the game
Click to expand...
As bad as we were in the second half we still scored a goal and won both halves of football. There’s more than 1 way to win a game of football
 
Last edited:
Was actually thinking ‘we could do with Watmore coming on here’ when we had our backs to the wall. Thought Jones coming on was to try to relieve the pressure and get us further forward, he had some success with it. As mentioned, Crooks vision and composure for the assist sealed the win
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top