coluka
Well-known member
You convieniently missed the bit where i said we need to learn from our history and use it to educate people, thanks for that. I am comfortable with how the people of Bristol intend to use Colston’s statue. The way it was toppled was a criminal act, mob rule I do not support.Ah the nonsense about "cancelling history".
No history is mostly what we are taught but the truth is often in what we are not taught. So yes, the truth that underlies history has to be uncovered. So when for example there are statues of slave traders like Edward Colston staring serenely across Bristol is it not right that the statue is removed? Or should we still simply honour his philanthropy without even acknowledging where he obtained the money to express his largesse?
It is not cancelling history to highlight the Slave Trade on which a lot of wealth was created and still benefits some.
This inaccurate history blights us, seeing the British Empire as some largely benevolent enterprise that "civilised the world" has engendered the myth of British/English Exceptionalism and contributed in no small measure to the rise of nationalism, insular attitude, Brexit and many other problems.
It is a fact, whether you like it or not that Colston played a significant part in making Bristol what it is today. Of course in modern times such acts would rightly be considered criminal and not tolerated. The slave trade is rightly an embarrassment to our nation as it is to many others, sadly it is still not totally eradicated, we still hear examples of it in this country today. However, we should use all statues as symbols to learn and educate both good and bad and yes, over time, remove them and replace with symbols and figures of positive actions fit for the modern world. The people of the area and their councils should decide their fate though not a riotous mob.