Heam44
Well-known member
Whilst it’s certainly not been completely ignored I feel it’s the main if not the only point that needs to be discussed. As surely there can only be on answer.Heam whilst I agree with you I don't think anyone has overlooked it. Some agree with that sentiment, some just don't care about the legality or responsability, or believe the government were correct because she may be considered a danger to national security. Take your pick which.
Regards to whether the decision is legal or not - I have no idea. And I believe the vast majority of us don’t have an idea.
Regards to her age and culpability etc I can understand both sides of the argument.
However when it comes to my point regarding whether we as a country SHOULD simply wash our hands of her and the moral and ethical implications of that decision, then surely there can only be one answer, that being “No we shouldn’t”. And upon realising that all the other points with regards to legalities, age, culpability and future threat etc are largely irrelevant.