That is worse than a robbery

Alvez_48

Alvez_48

Well-known member
Can't take that result at all, not only do we lose to horrific refereeing and completely headless chicken football after their goal.

The entire result came from the result of that challenge and it was such a crucial game to win.

Fry is likely out for a couple of weeks at least and Tav won't be back for a while.

I'm genuinely angry in a way that I've not felt for ages with football.

Season done for because of that Blackburn kid, in this moment I hope he gets hurt on the pitch one day.
 
Boro fell to pieces once they scored. It was a shocking goal to concede. Bola, Howson and Spence all at fault.

That said; there's no doubt Blackburn should have been down to ten men and Boro a chance from the penalty spot.
 
We were robbed and should have won that game. I don't want any rubbish that 'he didn't intend to hurt him', he was looking right at him and could have pulled out but went through with it. As for the ref, how the hell did he miss it? It was second phase after a corner so he should have been following the ball, awful. :mad:
 
**** him... What a disgraceful manager.

You played for Boro, you played at centre back, you're from Boro, you managed Boro and you F***ing say I didn't see it. **** you Tony Mowbray.
 
Mowbray said he didn't see it, had it pointed out after 70 mins. Lying get.
He says he's known "the kid" for a week and he's just doing what he's been told to do.
So kicking someone who is upright in the eye is ok? Just doing his job?
Mowbray could have shown some class and decency. In that interview he didn't at all.
Very poor.

We should have been one up through a penalty and with a man advantage, but the match should still have been won from where we were post incident.
We were desperately poor in that second half.
We are just not good enough.
 
indeedido said:
Mowbray said he didn't see it, had it pointed out after 70 mins. Lying get.
He says he's known "the kid" for a week and he's just doing what he's been told to do.
So kicking someone who is upright in the eye is ok? Just doing his job?
Mowbray could have shown some class and decency. In that interview he didn't at all.
Very poor.

We should have been one up through a penalty and with a man advantage, but the match should still have been won from where we were post incident.
We were desperately poor in that second half.
We are just not good enough.
Click to expand...

What I find baffling with Mowbray is his veiled insults about the style of football. He mentions not liking the physical approach and implies he's a total football manager. That completely ignores how some of his teams have been awful at times. His no Johan Cruyff or Pep Guardiola.
 
As soon as the commentator said they hadn't won for six games, I thought that was it. Same with Birmingham.

Bizarre. Any team on a bad run, needs a win, always break their duck against us. And I'm going back decades with this; it's nothing news!
 
Alvez_48 said:
Can't take that result at all, not only do we lose to horrific refereeing and completely headless chicken football after their goal.

The entire result came from the result of that challenge and it was such a crucial game to win.

Fry is likely out for a couple of weeks at least and Tav won't be back for a while.

I'm genuinely angry in a way that I've not felt for ages with football.

Season done for because of that Blackburn kid, in this moment I hope he gets hurt on the pitch one day.
Click to expand...
That's a fxxking disgraceful comment Alvez. Hoping someone gets injured. His foot was high yes, it was dangerous yes, he should have been off yes. But there was no intent so to say you hope he gets hurt is shameful.
If we had won the game there would be very little comment on the incident. Instead it's a straw you are clutching at. That's not the reason we lost. They were probably the better team and with a bit more composure could have scored more. That plus our own ineptness is the reason we lost.
 
Nero said:
What I find baffling with Mowbray is his veiled insults about the style of football. He mentions not liking the physical approach and implies he's a total football manager. That completely ignores how some of his teams have been awful at times. His no Johan Cruyff or Pep Guardiola.
Click to expand...
He spouted the same garbage after the game at Ewood even though we played them off the park.
 
asredastheycome said:
That's a fxxking disgraceful comment Alvez. Hoping someone gets injured. His foot was high yes, it was dangerous yes, he should have been off yes. But there was no intent so to say you hope he gets hurt is shameful.
If we had won the game there would be very little comment on the incident. Instead it's a straw you are clutching at. That's not the reason we lost. They were probably the better team and with a bit more composure could have scored more. That plus our own ineptness is the reason we lost.
Click to expand...

I don't think it was a disgraceful comment at all. That's how I felt in that moment. That kid could have blinded fry. I'm not clutching at any straws, I even say in the op how crap we were after the goal and look the seasons gone. It's done. Gutted.
 
asredastheycome said:
That's a fxxking disgraceful comment Alvez. Hoping someone gets injured. His foot was high yes, it was dangerous yes, he should have been off yes. But there was no intent so to say you hope he gets hurt is shameful.
If we had won the game there would be very little comment on the incident. Instead it's a straw you are clutching at. That's not the reason we lost. They were probably the better team and with a bit more composure could have scored more. That plus our own ineptness is the reason we lost.
Click to expand...
I agree nobody should wish injury on a player but to say they were the better team is utter rubbish.
 
Jr. SkinnyLegs said:
I agree nobody should wish injury on a player but to say they were the better team is utter rubbish.
Click to expand...
Yep, complete and utter gash! As for suggesting there would have been no comment if we had won, he's lucky he hasn't blinded him. The ref should have done a Mike Dean, looked at the damage and sent him off. The injury made the question of endangerment a 'matter of fact'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top