The two things are different.
Nobody is saying Coventry didn’t deserve to win.
The time wasting has to be stopped for the long term good of the game. £30 plus to watch a clown in goal run down the clock by messing around and a ref too weak to deal with it properly?
Time to stop making excuses for it.
It's been this way forever.
Professional fouls shouldn't be given the leniency they are either, but like it or not they're a part of the game and the players know that.
Referees don't apply the rules and book or red card players early in 'big' matches because they don't want to ruin the occasion.
Paddy was clearly elbowed at one stage and the culprit escaped punishment
Coventry's experienced players put in more than a few heavy challenges before bookings started coming out.
Where are you/we drawing the line here? There's hundreds of examples of where the game is not ideal, and that's before you start talking about having to pay 30 quid (and why that much is considered acceptable) in the first place.
Sure, if you want my opinion over whether it should be stopped in an ideal world then yes.
It remains more frustrating (and significant in terms of outcome on the match) to me, that we failed to score in 180 minutes of football.
Embarrassing that a team would shut us out for 120 minutes, score on our own turf in such an important match, then run the clock down and our response as a fanbase is to whimper about time wasting.
It's easer said than done because Coventry had a great game, but there's a way of preventing a team from doing that, and it involves taking the opportunity when it's there.