van Hecke

So we want a player to be offered extended terms by another club or Brighton want to pay us to take one of their players?[

No, the article says we want to take him on loan.

But he's also in the last 6 months of his contract, so I'd be surprised if Brighton allowed him to go to us on loan without a fee or them extending his contract.
They'd be losing him for nothing in June otherwise.
 
If he's first reserve, which he currently is, no point in going to a league where he's already played and proven himself. Problem is when Webster and the Chelsea loanee are ahead of him. I reckon he will stay at Brighton and possibly sign a new contract with them. Would be a good signing if we could have pulled it off (better than Clarke I think).
 
We need a new conspiracy theory so I'm going to suggest that Clarke is finished and Brighton covered up an injury so Gibbo has threatened to sue them so they've offered us Van Hecke as a peace offering.
That thought did cross my mind too! Lol
 
We need a new conspiracy theory so I'm going to suggest that Clarke is finished and Brighton covered up an injury so Gibbo has threatened to sue them so they've offered us Van Hecke as a peace offering.
Conspiracy theory number 2

We’re keeping our cards close to our chest on all our transfers as not to give an advantage to our competitors.

The Warnock Plan.. slow start to a strong playoff finish.
 
We'd need to free up a lot an slot you'd think?

Muniz you'd assume.
Only matters if they are in the squad, not at the club. Can have as many as you want in the 25 I think, just a limit of 5 named in the team/bench. Muniz doesn't always get on the bench and Mowatt could be dropped altogether now Barlaser is here. Expensive players not to be included at all which is why I am not a fan of loans. Would prefer this to be a purchase if he's any good otherwise we're just developing other team's players or paying big money for bench warmers.
 
Only matters if they are in the squad, not at the club. Can have as many as you want in the 25 I think, just a limit of 5 named in the team/bench. Muniz doesn't always get on the bench and Mowatt could be dropped altogether now Barlaser is here. Expensive players not to be included at all which is why I am not a fan of loans. Would prefer this to be a purchase if he's any good otherwise we're just developing other team's players or paying big money for bench warmers.
He’s out of contract in the summer..
 
Back
Top