Not mine, I really don’t get it.Think it will be Leo’s decision when or if he leaves the club. Man who holds a special place in fans hearts.
Big part of Karanka's set-up and probably its most passionate character, who chose to stick around after Aitor's sacking and was only forced out by the walking calamity that was Garry "All My Mates Are Agents" Monk. Had a horrific situation transpire back in Uruguay which left him in desperate need of support, which the club gave to him and he paid back in droves with passion and enthusiasm.Not mine, I really don’t get it.
Chose to stick around - continued to be well payed for not doing a great deal.
We should be so grateful…..
I'm assuming that you've basically avoided the Riverside since the days of McClaren if you think that Leo's coaching prowess and passion did not factor in our successes. Numerous goalkeepers - Dimi, Given, Randolph - have spoken highly of what he did for their game during their time at the club.Chose to stick around - continued to be well payed for not doing a great deal.
We should be so grateful…..
I'd happily have him coaching our goalkeepers again. Think he could work wonders for Lumley's confidence (which I think is the main detriment to his natural game).Leo was never part of Warnock's management team. He had him putting the cones out on match day. Leo has much more to offer than that but was excluded at every turn.
“You don’t know his job description or exactly what he does”You don’t know his job description or exactly what he does to know whether or not he does “a great deal”.
I think that was probably because Warnock could see he was a sentimental attachment who added little value but the boss said he had to stay.Leo was never part of Warnock's management team. He had him putting the cones out on match day. Leo has much more to offer than that but was excluded at every turn.
Probably not, Warnock likes having his own men in charge. Leo didn't fit into that so was never going to be massively active, although I daresay he will have had some influence on that squad over the last eighteen months.I think that was probably because Warnock could see he was a sentimental attachment who added little value but the boss said he had to stay.
“You don’t know his job description or exactly what he does”
That in itself speaks volumes.
Football Manager culture has completely ruined this perspective as fans reckon they know all the ins and outs of a club, not realising that them games in themselves do a lot of guesswork from an interjal set up perspective.It doesn’t really. Outside the manager and the odd other, and like many coaches, scouts etc, unless you’re actually on the inside you rarely know what they do on a daily basis and whether or not they are value for money.
So, as a manager he should have been able to kick him into touch.Probably not, Warnock likes having his own men in charge. Leo didn't fit into that so was never going to be massively active, although I daresay he will have had some influence on that squad over the last eighteen months.