newyddion
Well-known member
More! More! More!
Deal accepted for Morgan Rogers.
- Thread starter TeaCider
- Start date
Dybuk
Well-known member
To be fair - that's excellent business if it's all true
Glover_elbow
Well-known member
How do you like it How do you like it
Jonathan
Well-known member
Meh. Feels like we've been mugged off as usual to me really. If £10m up front and a bunch of potential add-ons is us doing good business and "playing hard ball" while other clubs get around £20m for their young players then I'm not overly enthused. Once again haemorrhaging creativity, only this time halfway through the season. Great.
Glover_elbow
Well-known member
Only if he shaves that pubescent bumfluff tashShould blow the lot and buy jack Clarke for the craic
TheWolfman
Well-known member
Great from us - We will end up with about 6m profit which in the grand scheme of things is fantastic. If he does poorly then his value will be at least less this figure we’re supposedly getting
atypical_boro
Well-known member
£6m does buy you 4 Morgan Rogers though....
atypical_boro
Well-known member
Has it actually been confirmed anywhere that City have a 20% sell-on clause?
MikeSkinner
Member
Happy with this like, before December he hardly had a look in unless it was in the Carling cup so I dont get how people are judging him to be a potential world beater. Not saying he might not be one but I would rather have 10-15 Million for a promotion push than him, and then potentially have a decent future income with a sell on fee.
Very much trust the process at Boro, they know best.
Very much trust the process at Boro, they know best.
We've just bought one of the most creative players in the championship this season.
GingerTravel
Well-known member
While I'd have been very happy to see him stay, you can't argue with the business sense that we signed a player for next to nothing and have sold him for many times more with him only playing a modest number of games.
Hamer took a couple of seasons to get to that point, looked the best player in the Championship towards the end of last season, and went for similar money. Rogers does have more potential and is younger - but if we also have a sell on clause, I'd say this is an overall win for us.
Hamer took a couple of seasons to get to that point, looked the best player in the Championship towards the end of last season, and went for similar money. Rogers does have more potential and is younger - but if we also have a sell on clause, I'd say this is an overall win for us.
atypical_boro
Well-known member
atypical_boro
Well-known member
TBF you can't knock him for accepting a 5.5 year deal. He's made for life. I hope it doesn't affect his motivation!
MichaelDebeve
Well-known member
Bit of a meh post in all honesty mate. Its all relevant
All transfers are different, all players are different regardless if they are young, in terms of ability, position and mentality/ personality. All selling clubs are in different positions. Not to mention all buying clubs offer different deals and packages.
To say X went for 20 million, why cant we get 20 too because hes young ... its a weak argument.
TeessideCleveland
Well-known member
So £11.25m after add ons when Citeh are paid?
viv_andersons_nana
Well-known member
You look ahead to Sunderland on Sunday as well, I mean we’re VERY stretched without Rogers. We were down to the bare bones anyway. There’ll be no Jones, Silvera, McGree, Latte Lath, now Rogers, we don’t know if Coburn is fit. It’s fine to celebrate the club coining it in but we need to start winning games and moving back up the league. We must surely have a player lined up to replace him.