"Yeah, but"
"He obviously doesn't mean it"
"Jeremy condemned Israel an hour earlier than Starmer did"
Interesting quotations. Who on here said those then?
"Yeah, but"
"He obviously doesn't mean it"
"Jeremy condemned Israel an hour earlier than Starmer did"
Where did I say someone on here said that? I'll wait.Interesting quotations. Who on here said those then?
Do you genuinely think that the leader of a supposedly left-leaning party shouldn't be making more noise than any random 'other' (politically) about an actual genocide and the deliberate targeting of aid workers?"What action are you taking as Labour Leader?"
Is this comment for real?
"You need to call them out far stronger than this."
Is it a pi$$ing contest?
Do you genuinely think that the leader of a supposedly left-leaning party shouldn't be making more noise than any random 'other' (politically) about an actual genocide and the deliberate targeting of aid workers?
Because he can’t influence it one jotHow are you managing to separate the destruction in Gaza with the man who takes the money and states that Israel have a right to do what they are doing?
Because he can’t influence it one jot
If you, him, me or Sunak called for a ceasefire they would just crack on.
The attack on the aid workers was clearly a targeted attack. They had the aid organisations logo all over their vehicle.
That organisation, and others, are now suspending aid operations in Gaza. Which was probably the Israeli plan all along.
There was nothing accidental about it. According to the BBC, the IDF targeted 3 vehicles in 3 separate strikes.I agree with you - Israel know what they are doing.
Let’s just explore the ‘accident’ theory for a moment.
A government waging terror on innocent civilians ‘accidentally’ kill those delivering aid.
Even if it was a stray shell -wtf
They had coordinated their movements with the IDF as well, so Israel knew who they were and where they would be. This was murder and a war crime.There was nothing accidental about it. According to the BBC, the IDF targeted 3 vehicles in 3 separate strikes.
Even the IDF have admitted 20 civilian casualties for a low grade target is proportionate as they will not waste smart bombs on small fry so bomb the house and kill the whole family, low grade is not Hamas terrorists but people who work for the Gaza state.Many will share your sentiments but the above is incorrect.
The Gaza Ministry of Health figures do not accord with this number and even so their figures have been disputed;
“The numbers are not real. That much is obvious to anyone who understands how naturally occurring numbers work. The casualties are not overwhelmingly women and children, and the majority may be Hamas fighters,” writes Abraham Wyner, a professor of statistics and data science at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, and the report’s author.
what does it say about the ToriesEven now UK politicians seem to be totally out of touch with the majority of the people.
3 stray shells 1 and a half miles apartI agree with you - Israel know what they are doing.
Let’s just explore the ‘accident’ theory for a moment.
A government waging terror on innocent civilians ‘accidentally’ kill those delivering aid.
Even if it was a stray shell -wtf
Reference for the admission please.Even the IDF have admitted 20 civilian casualties for a low grade target is proportionate as they will not waste smart bombs on small fry so bomb the house and kill the whole family, low grade is not Hamas terrorists but people who work for the Gaza state.