Perhaps some credit to Woodgate for buying him? Or maybe our recruitment team aren't as bad as some suggest just that Woodgate was worse than we thought? Point being we only see the end result so when we pass judgement as fans it is difficult to know where blame truly lies...What a difference a year makes. He looked awful under Woodgate.
Goes to show what a proper manager can do.
Bola was, not sure about Dijksteel.I'm sure he was Charlton's POTY the season before we signed him?
I don't quite agree that he looked awful under Woodgate, I mean yes, he is better now, but there was clear potential in him, he had maybe 2 bad games, and then some mediocre ones, but even in that first run in the side he had a couple of good games. Bola however looked inept in those early performances, he now actually looks a championship footballer.What a difference a year makes. He looked awful under Woodgate.
Don't think he did. Was stating to look ok when he got injured. If he had come from abroad people would have said he needs a season to settle. As it was he stepped up a league.What a difference a year makes. He looked awful under Woodgate.