Recent content by Bruciebonus

Exactly this, should be clear order of penalty takers. No need for disagreements on the pitch. Not the first time it's happened either.

Story I heard regarding Willie Maddren was that Revie rated him highly and believed he could be a potential replacement for Bobby Moore in the England team. But he never knew just how bad his knee injury was until he called him up for that England training camp. He realised then he couldn't rely...

I'd take a look at your own posts before accusing anyone of making a fool of themselves.

Criminal trials deal in guilt where civil trials deal in liability. Guilt and liability are not the same things. A criminal jury uses trial evidence to make a determination of innocence or guilt. A civil jury will use a lower threshold of evidence to make a finding of civil liability. That's why...

Civil courts don't find guilt they find liability.

Not sure I follow your logic, Trump insults his opponents and that's wrong so your going to do it? As for struggling, I'm not the 'thickie' relying on insults.

Well you do have to prove guilt 'beyond reasonable doubt'. In the eyes of the law 'innocent until proven guilty'. We just seem to be going round in circles, so we'll have to disagree. We'll at least you debated without resorting to personal insults.

I thought we'd already been over this? It's a civil trial there doesn't have to be solid proof.

Are you classing yourself as an academic?

No, I think you'll find I was defending myself.

I stated facts not opinions, you don't seem to have the mental capacity to distinguish the difference between the two. You only seem to have the mental capacity to be abusive to those who you disagree with.

To base your arguments on personal abuse is the very essence of stupidity.

The first thing any rape investigation would seek to establish is to place the accused in the vicinity of the accuser at the time of the allegation. If that can't be proven the investigation will go nowhere. You can't base a rape accusation on previous boorish comments or because he knows someone.

When I said unhinged I was referring to the abusive or rant filled responses. Take a look at your last post.

A 'standard of proof' which was very, very low. No physical evidence, no eye witnesses able to place the two of them together at the scene, no specific time or date the offence occurred. The last one being important as person like Trump that travels and carries out a lot of business...