The Pulis play-offs weren’t good but neither were the Carrick ones. We were poor across all 4 legs.
If people didn’t like Pulis’ whole tenure, fine, but I find it odd that so many seem to judge him entirely by those 2 Villa fixtures. I would never judge any manager on 1-2 matches, just as I wouldn’t Carrick.
Best
1. McClaren (he wasn’t my “favourite” but I think he did the best, even if he was also the best resourced)
2. Robson (probably my favourite but looking back we did do some bonkers stuff when he was around)
3. Lawrence (great achievement in 91-92, I only caught the end of the Rioch era when things had gone a bit sour so he edges it above Bruce, hopefully Carrick takes this spot soon. Karanka is nowhere near top 3 after the woeful PL season).
Worst
1. Woodgate (I like that he’s redeeming himself now but his spell in charge was just abysmal).
2. Strachan (also woeful though I didn’t hate him as a person like many did).
3. Wilder (never warned to him as a person and after a decent start we were awful from the spring of last year until the autumn).
Fourth would be Southgate, then Monk, and Agnew would have to be in there somewhere. For me, just my personal view, Warnock and Pulis were nowhere near as bad as the above 6 and both managers left us in better league positions than they found us.