Norman_Conquest
Well-known member
I've got to agree, he's running at full pelt and gets a shove in his back which makes him put his foot on top of the ball.Come on chappy 2 fouls 2 injuries. It's not training methods tonight.
I've got to agree, he's running at full pelt and gets a shove in his back which makes him put his foot on top of the ball.Come on chappy 2 fouls 2 injuries. It's not training methods tonight.
Wasn't a clear penaltySome idiot reporter inferred Carrick's training methods increased the risk of injury, quite some time ago,..........and got the answer he deserved.
No training “regime” can account for two dirty Chelsea tackles and not being given a clear penalty
No, I don't myself. I do think the first one could have been given as a penalty and the second was a simple shove.I don't think either tackle was dirty tbh, just unfortunate, nothing in the second one. We just have no luck at the moment.
Really? If that's in the middle of the pitch it's a foul every single time. It was an obvious penalty I thought.Wasn't a clear penalty
It would've been a foul anywhere else on the pitch. Only not given because the shot had got awayWasn't a clear penalty
We have loads of luck at the moment, its just bad.I don't think either tackle was dirty tbh, just unfortunate, nothing in the second one. We just have no luck at the moment.
If three ex-footballers on Tees an BBC 5 Live all agree it was a penalty. I trust their judgement.Wasn't a clear penalty
It was a penalty roofieIf three ex-footballers on Tees an BBC 5 Live all agree it was a penalty. I trust their judgement.
YesDo we only have one more substitution 'window'?
No one on the pitch appealed for it. They didn't even mention it in commentary. It didn't really occur to be that it might have been a peno until I looked on here!!Really? If that's in the middle of the pitch it's a foul every single time. It was an obvious penalty I thought.