We don't really need him.Absolutely no chance. They would want money back and probably a little more. He's also probably been on at least double what we paid him. He was already one of our highest earners.
Think we need to move on from wanting former players to come back. We made a significant profit on him that's been used to strengthen other areas. So no logic then 'giving' them the money back and some.
We don't really need him. Just need to find a half decent forward to rotate or challenge Latte Lath and Coburn. That and strengthen the left side of attack
Silvera and Greenwood weren't good enough or suited to that role.
I imagine a newly promoted side or lower end prem may take a punt. I'm not sure he will have an abundance of suiters.
It's not about want, I'd love us to take Akpom, but its a realisation of the reality of the situation.Sounds like most want us down the footer player boot sale, looking for players we can do up. We`ve done alright though with Rogers and Manny the goal machine, so it makes sense.
I dont think he would want to return to the Champo at the moment anyway MDP. As mentioned, he would command a huge wage where ever he goes.It's not about want, I'd love us to take Akpom, but its a realisation of the reality of the situation.
My goodness, we don't need a 29 goal number 10?We don't really need him.
We can but dream. Imagine a 433 with Archer Lath Akpom up top.
Yeah it was a joke. Don't get your knickers in a twist about it.Is this a joke? It’s an awful idea and wouldn’t work at all. Why would you play 2 of those 3 wide. No chance.
I’d take Akpom back in a heartbeat as a 10 to play centrally. Not wide
We don’t need Archer unless ELL leaves as neither will want to be back up to the other.