Appeal unsuccessful

[Sexpom]

You said it was no doubt a penalty now you’re saying he bought it. Make your mind up pal

He has bought it by going down but fry had a hold of him which is a foul.

 

[ForssAwakens]

He has bought it by going down but fry had a hold of him which is a foul.

Not at any time in the box, we’ve been disputing whether it was a penalty rather than a foul the last few posts

This is what is wrong with social media, when presented with evidence they either double down or chnage the narrative rather than admit they were wrong

 

[Way_Out_West]

 

[BobendBert]

Some fans working really hard to prove it was a penalty

It wasn't even a ruddy foul!

 

[ForssAwakens]

We’ve gone from, ‘penalty, it’s really not that difficult’

To

‘I’m not disputing Stewart bought the penalty’

 

[Sexpom]

We’ve gone from, ‘penalty, it’s really not that difficult’

To

‘I’m not disputing Stewart bought the penalty’

Word twister, what I’m saying is he went down easily yes but fry had a hold of him which is illegal so a foul was given. I think the ref and Lino got it right.

 

[BobendBert]

Word twister, what I’m saying is he went down easily yes but fry had a hold of him which is illegal so a foul was given. I think the ref and Lino got it right.

Apart from the dive and it being outside of the box you mean?

 

[Liamo]

Of course it matters where Stewart was, the fact his foot was on the line meant it was a penalty.

That's not what the law is though, it's the location of the contact (which if there was any, was either with the back foot or the arm, outside the area) that counts.

I had this confirmed by the IFAB via email, just yesterday.


So assuming there was a foul, it should have been a direct free kick, not a penalty.

 

[ForssAwakens]

Word twister, what I’m saying is he went down easily yes but fry had a hold of him which is illegal so a foul was given. I think the ref and Lino got it right.

Word twister, they are direct quotes

 

[HolgateCorner]

Word twister, what I’m saying is he went down easily yes but fry had a hold of him which is illegal so a foul was given. I think the ref and Lino got it right.

Stewart was clever and knew how to make it look like he had been taken out, Fry a bit naive.

I think the ref and Lino definitely got it wrong but I can see why they got it wrong.

No excuse at the other end when Chuba was fouled though, that should have been a penalty and a red as well.

No idea why the ref got that wrong, have you?

 

[Sexpom]

Stewart was clever and knew how to make it look like he had been taken out, Fry a bit naive.

I think the ref and Lino definitely got it wrong but I can see why they got it wrong.

No excuse at the other end when Chuba was fouled though, that should have been a penalty and a red as well.

No idea why the ref got that wrong, have you?

Yes he got that wrong, also missed a penalty for Sunderland when smith fouled Ballard in the box.

 

[SmogonOuseburn]

Yes he got that wrong, also missed a penalty for Sunderland when smith fouled Ballard in the box.

You have been proved to be wrong in your assertion that it was a penalty because “Stewart’s foot was on the line”, but have not accepted it. Why are you so keen to think Sunderland should have had another penalty as well?

 

[ForssAwakens]

You have been proved to be wrong in your assertion that it was a penalty because “Stewart’s foot was on the line”, but have not accepted it. Why are you so keen to think Sunderland should have had another penalty as well?

Starting to think it could an agent mackem

 

[Sexpom]

You have been proved to be wrong in your assertion that it was a penalty because “Stewart’s foot was on the line”, but have not accepted it. Why are you so keen to think Sunderland should have had another penalty as well?

When smith went through Ballard? It was just as bad as the chuba one. I just say it how I see it I’m not clouded by bias.

 

[ForssAwakens]

When smith went through Ballard? It was just as bad as the chuba one. I just say it how I see it I’m not clouded by bias.

Apart from the mackem bias for the Stewart incident

 

[muniz]

Will we be deducted three points?

we were on sunday

 

[Corcaigh_the_Cat]

we were on sunday

Through not turning up.

 

[Sexpom]

Apart from the mackem bias for the Stewart incident

I don’t think we are going to agree on this mate I think what we can agree on is that we were poor and didn’t turn up which was disappointing and we put it right on Saturday.

 

[Mendieta14]

View attachment 51614

I cant believe he waited until he got into the box before going over.. I am shocked!

 

[HolgateCorner]

Yes he got that wrong, also missed a penalty for Sunderland when smith fouled Ballard in the box.

Not sure about the Smith one on Ballard you see those kind of wrestles all the time in the area, can see why that wasn’t given, not the Chuba one though he just took him out from behind.