Cardiffdaffs
Well-known member
It really does - you are correct there.Jesus Christ, they’re really admitting this in public. Anonymity really does have a lot to answer for!
It really does - you are correct there.Jesus Christ, they’re really admitting this in public. Anonymity really does have a lot to answer for!
at 18 are you really mature enough to consent to doing anything pornographic on film which could get out on the internet without any control in the futureIt’s non of you effing business frankly. I personally wouldn’t but If they are adult and consenting then who are we to worry.
He wasn't dating teenagers?
Even the Sun haven't span that allegation, as far as I can see.
There is nothing wrong with a 61 year old having a relationship privately with another adult legally whatever the age gap. Who are you to moralise about that?
It’s non of you effing business frankly. I personally wouldn’t but If they are adult and consenting then who are we to worry.
I couldn't give a crap who sleeps with who or who identifies as what. It make no difference to me. Most straight blokes seem to enjoy a bit of bun on bun action as a spectator sport but in my experience getting involved yourself and having threesomes with two women can get a bit weird.I think some are offended by a sausage and a sausage. If it was a sausage and a bun then they wouldn‘t be offended, a bun and a bun is even better.
It gets even worse for them when a sausage is a bun, and wants to be with another sausage. Or a bun appears to be a sausage, but can be a sausage or a bun, and want to be with a sausage or a bun, or a bun that appears to be sausage, or a sausage that appears to be a bun, or a mushroom that isn’t a sausage or a bun.
Stop being so judgemental.
With apologies to anyone offended by my clumsy analogy.
I couldn't give a crap who sleeps with who or who identies as what. It make no difference to me. Most straight blokes seem to enjoy a bit of bun on bun action as a spectator sport, but in my experience getting involved yourself and having threesomes with two women can get a bit weird.
For the record I had a nineteen year old girlfriend when I was twenty seven and my last 'proper' girlfriend was twelve years younger than I am. Who should I call first? The Sun or the police?
I have NEVER had a threesome with two blonde rock chicks in a ball park when there were was a sixty year old and an eighteen year old watching and taking photos. What do you think I am? Some kind of tart?It’s not really in the same ball park as a 60 year old and a 18 year old though, is it?
No, I wouldn't.Let’s be clear, the young person in question was only 17 when it started - Edwards took advantage of this minor age person through unscrupulous means i.e. by using his high profile status to impress a vulnerable and impressionable young person, and offering large some of cash in return for sexually explicit photos. Imagine if that was your 17 year old son or daughter being preyed upon by someone of that age - would you think it was ok ?
Yes, this is not a binary argument.No, I wouldn't.
But I also wouldn't appreciate my parents making my business national news after we had become estranged.
is it the winky on the mythical sprite Ariel from a made up story that makes it inappropriate or the sculptor who shagged his daughters and dog that makes it inappropriate?Yes i would say it is, and so would most people i would hope. Apparently the BBC have a problem with identifying this kind of thing though. Let’s also not forget they have a highly inappropriate statue on display outside their building, created by a known paedophile - big clue there as to there “standards” i guess