atypical_boro
Well-known member
Odd that he has chosen to interview a postman from Teesdale
......but anyway.
Its been on my playlist since it was released just after Christmas, but I've finally got round to listening to it. Lots of discussion and insight about the Karanka era.
One thing that I noted was that Philip had a strong feeling Karanka was angling to go long before Gibson actually dropped the axe (and presumably was never going to quit without compensation).
It got me thinking, how should clubs deal with this? You can incentivise a manager to perform well, by giving him a promotion or survival bonus, but if he realises that achievement is not realistic and starts deliberately underperforming (or just not caring) you still can't really sack them without paying them compensation, unless you have concrete evidence that they have committed an act of misconduct (hard to prove).
You can't really try to put in a manager's contract that if he fails to keep you up he has to pay the club a chunk of compensation - can you? Or if you did, you'd have to expect it to inflate their basic wage for them to agree to sign it.
Tricky one isn't it, as so much rides on the roles of the manager. Even if it is, at best, overstated.
Some of the podcast is actually really interesting, though the more I read/hear about Aitor since he left from various sources, the more he comes across as a total coont and/or just wasn't cut out for management. Was it just a case of beginner's luck that we benefitted from? Since the autumn of 2016 there's very little evidence to suggest otherwise.
Its been on my playlist since it was released just after Christmas, but I've finally got round to listening to it. Lots of discussion and insight about the Karanka era.
One thing that I noted was that Philip had a strong feeling Karanka was angling to go long before Gibson actually dropped the axe (and presumably was never going to quit without compensation).
It got me thinking, how should clubs deal with this? You can incentivise a manager to perform well, by giving him a promotion or survival bonus, but if he realises that achievement is not realistic and starts deliberately underperforming (or just not caring) you still can't really sack them without paying them compensation, unless you have concrete evidence that they have committed an act of misconduct (hard to prove).
You can't really try to put in a manager's contract that if he fails to keep you up he has to pay the club a chunk of compensation - can you? Or if you did, you'd have to expect it to inflate their basic wage for them to agree to sign it.
Tricky one isn't it, as so much rides on the roles of the manager. Even if it is, at best, overstated.
Some of the podcast is actually really interesting, though the more I read/hear about Aitor since he left from various sources, the more he comes across as a total coont and/or just wasn't cut out for management. Was it just a case of beginner's luck that we benefitted from? Since the autumn of 2016 there's very little evidence to suggest otherwise.
Last edited: