Cup-Tied

I think its days are numbered. It may change to cant play against former club or cant play in the immediate next round so if you play for X in R1 you cant play for Y in R2 but you're okay in R3, but yeah its all a bit daft when you think about it.
 
I think it is outdated for domestic cups. I can't see UEFA scrapping it for European comps anytime soon though.
 
I maybe alone in this it seems, but by their nature cup competitions are knock-out based and if a player is beaten with one team it doesn't seem right he turns up later on the same competition with another.

I don't think it's about competitive advantage, that's not the issue behind the rule.
 
Last edited:
I maybe alone in this it seems, but by their nature cup competitions are knock-out based and if a player is beaten with one team it doesn't seem right he turns up later on the same competition with another.

I don't think it's about competitive average, that's not the issue behind the rule.
I tend to agree with that. The other point though is if the players previous club haven't been knocked out. Call me a "traditionalist" but if you are knocked out you are knocked out club and player.
 
Leagues have set transfer rules - i.e windows and registrations forms, so players are "league tied" until a transfer happens. Cups are easier than leagues, you can only play for one team in that cup for that year, You don't need a transfer process.

It can work both ways, in village cricket, one year my Dad's team had been knocked out of a cup 1st round and he hadn't played that game, so, cleared by the cup organiser, he played for another village as they were short of players. I cant see the FA, EFL etc allowing us or anyone else to borrow a non cup tied payer for a game or two though.....
 
Back
Top