Examining Yuka’s Ratings
Let’s look at some examples to understand how Yuka rates food. We’ll start with cottage cheese, a seemingly healthy food. Yuka gives it a low rating of 45 out of 100, labeling it as “poor” and displaying a yellow light. However, examining why Yuka rates cottage cheese this way is essential.
Yuka points out that cottage cheese contains polysorbates as an emulsifier, suggesting that these additives are known to cause autoimmune diseases and disrupt gut microflora. Importantly, these claims have no direct connection to cancer risk.
Yuka does provide scientific references to support its claims, but upon closer examination, these references include mouse studies and simulated models that are not directly applicable to human health.
Furthermore, Yuka contradicts itself by citing the European Food Safety Agency’s stance that this additive does not raise safety concerns while maintaining that Yuka considers the most recent animal studies. This inconsistency erodes the app’s credibility.
Missing the Positives
Despite its low Yuka rating, cottage cheese offers numerous benefits for cancer survivors, such as being high in protein, low in calories, and low in saturated fats. These positive aspects are often overshadowed by the app’s focus on additives, leading users to miss out on valuable nutrition potentially.
Canned Tuna, a Positive Example
Let’s look at canned tuna, which Yuka rates positively with a score of 78 out of 100 and a green light. Yuka notes that it’s a bit too salty, but it acknowledges the product’s advantages overall. Canned tuna is higher in protein, lower in calories, and lower in saturated fats, making it a favorable option for cancer survivors.
Protein Bars: A Controversial Rating
However, when we scan a typical protein bar, Yuka gives it a dismal rating of 27 out of 100 and a red light, citing it as “too caloric.” This raises significant concerns because Yuka’s one-size-fits-all approach to calories disregards individual nutritional needs, especially for cancer survivors who may require specific dietary adjustments.
Additionally, Yuka identifies sucralose as a hazardous additive in protein bars, referencing the NutriNets on Taste study. However, Yuka’s interpretation of this study is misleading, as it does not accurately account for body weight, a critical factor in evaluating cancer risk.
Conclusion: Yuka’s Impact on Cancer Survivors
In summary, the Yuka app simplifies complex nutritional information into black-and-white categories, which can be problematic, especially for cancer survivors. Nutrition is highly individualized, and a rigid app like Yuka may discourage cancer survivors from consuming genuinely beneficial foods.
Moreover, Yuka’s tendency to label additives as hazardous without robust evidence and its lack of consideration for individualized dietary needs raise concerns. Most alarmingly, the app may trigger food fear and anxiety in cancer survivors, which can harm their overall well-being.
Refference:
- https://www.cancer.net/survivorship/what-cancer-survivorship
- https://thesoftbest.com/is-yuka-app-legit-reliable-accurate/
