Great finish by Bamford

What, like a "manager"?

It's almost like Gibson was letting him do the job he was employed to do, the calculating batsard.

That is not JUST what Gibson asked of him though. You know it too, if you don’t then you are maybe a little blinkered as well as sarcastic.
 
He was tasked, as you say, with restructuring the football club. With managing a reduction in the wage bill and the squad size. That Pullis chose to do this by (effectively) swapping Bamford for Saville is Pullis' decision not Gibson's unless you seriously believe that a Chairman renowned for supporting his managers sold Bamford behind Pullis back? Indeed Pullis, who has a penchant for rewriting history in his favour has never even as much as hinted at such a thing.

Nonsense.
 
He was tasked, as you say, with restructuring the football club. With managing a reduction in the wage bill and the squad size. That Pullis chose to do this by (effectively) swapping Bamford for Saville is Pullis' decision not Gibson's unless you seriously believe that a Chairman renowned for supporting his managers sold Bamford behind Pullis back? Indeed Pullis, who has a penchant for rewriting history in his favour has never even as much as hinted at such a thing.

Nonsense.

Are you being deliberately as obtuse as you are sarcastic? I have never said or implied Gibson sold him behind his back. I am saying Gibson was the man that agreed to accept Leeds offer and sell Bamford. Pulis was an employee not running the club he was answerable to Gibson not the other way round.

As a manager (non football) myself I had responsibilities. Sometimes those extended to doing as I was told rather than making the decision myself. Sometimes decisions are taken by others higher up the command but delivered by their managers. That happens at every large organisation not just football clubs. Mr Gibson is perfectly entitled to run his business how he sees fit and rightly so. As a customer I am entitled to have my view. The club is very cloak and dagger like many others, people speculate, sometimes rightly, sometimes wrongly.

You appear to me to have an old fashioned view on responsibility and assumption of where it lays within structured organisations. Apologies if I am wrong, I just go by what you post. The person responsible is not always responsible for his or her decisions when a person with greater command tells you what they wants you to do or what they want to happen. I have managed in different organisations and never once was I or other managers allowed to have full responsibility for everything in our day to day responsibilities, others meddle because they can, thats life. He who pays the piper calls the tune as they say.

If you think its nonsense thats fine. I have never suggested Pulis was not happy doing all he did or was not involved with carrying out the duties he was employed to do. Your problem is one of interpretation of my comments and thoughts of what his role involved. Your own view is differing view to mine, big deal. I give credit where i think it's due and criticism where i think appropriate, sometimes I am right sometimes I aren’t. I remember you criticising my comments on transfers about ‘the gifts’ it must have hurt when Stewy said it became clear karanka never wanted him or words to that effect on Radio.
 
Both pulis and Gibson are to blame for the stupid sale of Bamford - I think anybody with football knowledge knew it was stupid.
pulis for making the decision to get rid.
Gibson for letting him and then letting him spunk all the fee on Saville.
 
Both Christie and Forshaw were profits on transfer dealings (salaries excluded) they generated money and freed up salaries for incomings and both were good deals tbf as Christie is as bad a RB in modern football as there is, and we have had a few. I totally see your point on the back me or sack me bit, I just think things were maybe a bit more ‘complex’ than that from the snippets I have been told. I think both viewpoints are plausible, the truth i doubt will ever be published, non disclosure contracts will prevent that i’m sure.
Selling Christie and getting money back was a good deal; Forshaw for the fee was also good too.
I was happy with both sales, but all I was saying was that pulis was happy to sell from day 1 in order to earn his cut.
I can't obviously comment on the snippets you have been told and I also have absolutely no reason to dispute it.
We share a balanced view on Gibson. On this occasion I just interpret his actions differently given the evidence of signing Saville.
It may well be you do know more about it than me.
 
Selling Christie and getting money back was a good deal; Forshaw for the fee was also good too.
I was happy with both sales, but all I was saying was that pulis was happy to sell from day 1 in order to earn his cut.
I can't obviously comment on the snippets you have been told and I also have absolutely no reason to dispute it.
We share a balanced view on Gibson. On this occasion I just interpret his actions differently given the evidence of signing Saville.
It may well be you do know more about it than me.
Oh, I see what you mean re Pulis and his cut, sorry was perhaps being a bit dim on that point 👍

I wasn’t meaning to suggest I was absolutely in the know here, I’m not saying that, my snippets are not from the horses mouth and clearly therefore can’t be guaranteed to be accurate, it is my take on matters.
 
Some people on here act like Bamford is the ex girlfriend who won't talk to them anymore. "It would be great if we could just get back together" Acting like stalkers, it's strange.
 
Some people on here act like Bamford is the ex girlfriend who won't talk to them anymore. "It would be great if we could just get back together" Acting like stalkers, it's strange.
Not really. We've had to put up with being dreadful up front because the club sold our only quality forward and signed average players like Flint, and Saville. It's a very valid talking point given that the player we sold is currently delivering in the top flight.
 
Back
Top