Harry Kane - England's all time record goalscorer

Ebor said:
A 20 yard pearler, or sht header, would have been more fitting, rather than really dodgy penna
Was Rooney's a penna too?
Click to expand...
Rooney's 50th goal, which at the time set a new record, was also a penalty.

7 of Rooney's 53 goals were penalties.
19 of Kane's 54 were penalties.
 
BoroFur said:
He's effectively a one-club man which is something to be admired in this day and age.

And he can't help playing for England. There's only 11 Englishmen in our history who can claim to have won something.

It's not a night to be churlish mate 👍
Click to expand...
Facts speak for themselves.
Its a fact hes wasted at Spurs.
Without him they would be nothing more than mid-table.
No medals or cups for being a "one club man".
He`s won nothing and he wont with Spurs.
He`s doing himself no justice staying with them.
Do himself a favour and move on.
 
Kane is much more than a great goal scorer. His passing ability is outstanding, his link-up play play brilliant and his work rate top class. He's an all round great player and one of England's best ever.
 
r00fie1 said:
Facts speak for themselves.
Its a fact hes wasted at Spurs.
Without him they would be nothing more than mid-table.
No medals or cups for being a "one club man".
He`s won nothing and he wont with Spurs.
He`s doing himself no justice staying with them.
Do himself a favour and move on.
Click to expand...
He tried to move on last summer but Levy wouldn't let him.

Something to do with signing a long term contract.
 
That's a false comparison @r00fie1. Spence was told he wouldn't get any game time if he stayed at Spurs so was given the opportunity to go out on loan which he took.

Kane is England's captain and Spurs' prime asset on a long term contract with no buy-out clause and an infamous owner to deal with.

You're being incredibly naive if you think Kane can unilaterally decide when to leave and who to leave for.
 
Kane believed Levy when Levy said he wouldn't hold him to his contract. Levy held him to his contract. Kane, to his credit, has continued to play to the best of his ability. Unless Spurs agree to sell him, Kane can't move until his contract ends. It takes all parties involved to agree to end a player's contract early.

We decided to sell Spence because unlike Kane, he would sulk if we refused and he was worth more to us as money than a sulking player. Overall, it has worked out best for us and Spence.

Likewise, it is clear that Gibson made a gentleman's agreement with Tav (and likely some other players) that we would agree a move to a Prem club if we didn't get promoted. Unlike Levy, Gibson kept his agreement. If Gibson had gone back on it, Tav would probably have acted much like Kane. Losing Tav was definitely not a positive for us but, ironically, by adding yet more fuel to Wilder's rage it contributed to his departure and Carrick coming in. In a roundabout way, it worked out well for us eventually.
 
Diego said:
If only it was that easy. If it was he would be playing for Man City right now
Click to expand...
Talk to his agent.
He should be playing at a club likely to win trophies and the prem.
Not doing his self justice.
At 29 he needs to move on to a decent club.
He would have won the Premier League and FA Cup with Leicester in 2016 and 2021 !

Spurs won the League Cup in 2008 [Harry was 14]
The FA Cup an Charity Shield in 1991 [Harry wasnt born]
Last game wone in europe: UEFA Cup Winner Cup 1963
Europa Leage 84
 
BoroFur said:
That's a false comparison @r00fie1. Spence was told he wouldn't get any game time if he stayed at Spurs so was given the opportunity to go out on loan which he took.

Kane is England's captain and Spurs' prime asset on a long term contract with no buy-out clause and an infamous owner to deal with.

You're being incredibly naive if you think Kane can unilaterally decide when to leave and who to leave for.
Click to expand...
He has a choice.
He has an agent.
Other clubs have money to pay off a contract.
The main point is - hes not getting what he deserves.
He wont win a damn thing with Spurs.
 
Bruce said:
Kane believed Levy when Levy said he wouldn't hold him to his contract. Levy held him to his contract. Kane, to his credit, has continued to play to the best of his ability. Unless Spurs agree to sell him, Kane can't move until his contract ends. It takes all parties involved to agree to end a player's contract early.

We decided to sell Spence because unlike Kane, he would sulk if we refused and he was worth more to us as money than a sulking player. Overall, it has worked out best for us and Spence.

Likewise, it is clear that Gibson made a gentleman's agreement with Tav (and likely some other players) that we would agree a move to a Prem club if we didn't get promoted. Unlike Levy, Gibson kept his agreement. If Gibson had gone back on it, Tav would probably have acted much like Kane. Losing Tav was definitely not a positive for us but, ironically, by adding yet more fuel to Wilder's rage it contributed to his departure and Carrick coming in. In a roundabout way, it worked out well for us eventually.
Click to expand...
If Kane made it clear he wants to leave - and his agent does his job - there are much bigger clubs who can afford to pay off his contract and give the lad the opportunity to have some silverware on his mantle-piece. He deserves it. Levy prefers a flash stadium to winning trophies.
 
Somebody just completely ignoring the transfer saga from last season, I see.

Kane made it clear he wanted to leave, Spurs said they wouldn't sell him and turned down every single bid from Man City, there was nothing more Kane could have done to get his move.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top