BobUpnDown
Well-known member
Test match.. that could be the 4 days.. so about 25k average..I heard one of the Indian commentators say that there were over 100,000 paid entries over the test match.
Test match.. that could be the 4 days.. so about 25k average..I heard one of the Indian commentators say that there were over 100,000 paid entries over the test match.
Could/should have won a really close one with NZ too if memory serves. Could easily have been an even better record.So far, Stokes has captained England in 20 Tests (including the ongoing Test against India), winning 13 games, losing five, and drawing one. His win percentage of 68.42% (among those who have captained the side in at least 10 Tests) is the best in England's 147-year history in Test cricket.
I've obviously copied and pasted that but that's a very very impressive record so far as captain. Now won 14 in 20!
Could/should have won a really close one with NZ too if memory serves. Could easily have been an even better record.
One things for sure, it’s brilliant viewing.
It certainly is in a different place. But we did win the first test last time as well. And without first needing to get into a position after two days where we were almost certain to lose it. So I am not sure that’s the best example!After day two, I was having memories of our last tour of India. I wasn’t expecting to be waking up at 4am on day 4 with a sneak of setting up a match winning situation. This team is in such a different place, mentally.
It was a monumental effort. Not sure we’ll see many better innings than Ollie Popes.
The one thing I really like about this England side, is that they’re adding a bit of brain and nuance to their approach.
As always Stokes is leading by example. I remember in one of his earliest Test Matches as captain. We 50-odd for 5 and he skipped down the wicket and smacked the ball to mid on. Everyone at Headingley couldn’t believe the recklessness we were seeing.
Back then, it almost felt like he was sacrificing his personal game plan to send a wider message to the team about the positive approach he wanted them to take, regardless of match situation.
I'm not sure that this is a one off. His line and length were very very consistent and he was causing trouble for them every single over.Just watched the highlights — talk about a one man show from England, although the new lad Hartley really did catch the Indian batters on the hop. I’m not too sure if he’ll replicate that again!
To be honest, I totally forgot that we won the first test last time. It was more an overall point regarding the memories from the series in general, although some of the pitches were turning square from ball one.It certainly is in a different place. But we did win the first test last time as well. And without first needing to get into a position after two days where we were almost certain to lose it. So I am not sure that’s the best example!
But … what I would say, and what I suspect Stokes would say, is that we won that match. And we won that series. And the next one. And the one after that. So even if he was just making a point, it was a damn good one.
It’s a mindset that is prepared to gamble where previous test match wisdom was that you didn’t. Successful gamblers don’t need to win every bet, they just need to come out ahead. Stokes will lose matches that a traditional captain would have drawn and win matches that a traditional captain would have drawn. So long as there are more of the latter than the former he’s a winner. Which he was at Headingley in 2022, and which he has been overall to a greater extent than any other England captain.
I think this is the key with "bazball" some seem to think it's all about slogging the ball around or playing one day or twenty twenty cricket in a test match. But it's not.To be honest, I totally forgot that we won the first test last time. It was more an overall point regarding the memories from the series in general, although some of the pitches were turning square from ball one.
But totally agree on Stokes. I remember a lot of people giving him and the team pelters on a regular basis over the last few years, each time we had a bad session or day. Particularly early doors in The Ashes.
We’re certainly fine tuning our game plans though. We scored at a good rate this morning but there was nothing thing reckless about our approach. We ran with intent, hit the bad balls and just took a positive approach. You can see how demoralising it is for the opposition when we get going. We’ve done it to every side we’ve played under Stokes so far, in various conditions.
Long may it continue.
Some interesting stats on Bazball.I think this is the key with "bazball" some seem to think it's all about slogging the ball around or playing one day or twenty twenty cricket in a test match. But it's not.
It's about playing with positive intent. Intent to score runs, intent to take wickets, intent to win the match rather draw.
Sometimes that will look a bit like trying to play white ball cricket, but that's not the objective.
Traditionally, test cricket has been as much about limiting mistakes as trying to attack teams. You "built" an innings, you "saw off" the new ball, you try to stifle the run rate and frustrate the batsman.
It's a complete mindset change and it's great to see.
To get a bit carried away, I think Carrick probably has a similar mindset in his coaching style and how he wants us to play.