Newcastle west ham

Alzi said:
We’d be loving it if it was giving for us and replacing “cheat” with “genius”.

The board would be in uproar if that wasn’t given and cost us a game.

Not much room for being “objective” when you support a football team. All part of the fun.
Click to expand...
I’d love it to be given for us. But wouldn’t be in uproar if it wasn’t.

I’m happy for Boro to get a dubious decision but wouldn’t just agree with it because it’s Boro.

Plenty of room for objectively when you support a team. Take the luck but offer an objective opinion. Still having fun 👍🏼

I’d I wouldn’t say Gordon was cheating. Just think it’s the wrong call.
 
It'll be interesting to hear the VAR conversation around that decision. I'm guessing that it is one of those where had the ref not given it they wouldn't have overturned it either.

Cheat/Clever? Both?

What I want to see is refs issue more yellow cards for "simulation" not simply wave away appeals. There is no credible reason not to dive as punishment is hardly ever metered out. Honest players who stay on their feet (if any still ply the trade) would be rewarded and we would have a more "honest" game after a period of adjustment.
 
Muttley said:
It'll be interesting to hear the VAR conversation around that decision. I'm guessing that it is one of those where had the ref not given it they wouldn't have overturned it either.

Cheat/Clever? Both?

What I want to see is refs issue more yellow cards for "simulation" not simply wave away appeals. There is no credible reason not to dive as punishment is hardly ever metered out. Honest players who stay on their feet (if any still ply the trade) would be rewarded and we would have a more "honest" game after a period of adjustment.
Click to expand...

The ref didn't give it on field, VAR made him go and review it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top