Norman_Conquest
Well-known member
Only to those who don't understand the rules.Yes but this is not a matter of judgment or nuance, like off-side or handball, it is just objectively illogical.
Only to those who don't understand the rules.Yes but this is not a matter of judgment or nuance, like off-side or handball, it is just objectively illogical.
And those who struggle with logic?Only to those who don't understand the rules.
Well I'd like someone to explain it, other than 'because'.And those who struggle with logic?
Hope this helps - The reason behind it is because the ball is not considered to be in play until it has touched another player. In the case of a direct free kick, the ball must touch another player (from either team) before a goal can be scored. If the ball goes directly into the kicker's own goal, it is as if the ball has not yet been put into play, and a corner kick is awarded to the opposing team.Well I'd like someone to explain it, other than 'because'.
I think you've just described an indirect free kick there.Hope this helps - The reason behind it is because the ball is not considered to be in play until it has touched another player. In the case of a direct free kick, the ball must touch another player (from either team) before a goal can be scored. If the ball goes directly into the kicker's own goal, it is as if the ball has not yet been put into play, and a corner kick is awarded to the opposing team.
Wrong!Hope this helps - The reason behind it is because the ball is not considered to be in play until it has touched another player. In the case of a direct free kick, the ball must touch another player (from either team) before a goal can be scored. If the ball goes directly into the kicker's own goal, it is as if the ball has not yet been put into play, and a corner kick is awarded to the opposing team.
I am and have read the question wrong from the off until Rofesleg pointed it out. I think The Chase has missed in direct out of the question for the answer to be corner.Wrong!
The rule applies to both Direct and Indirect free kicks. The correct answer is still a corner.I am and have read the question wrong from the off until Rofesleg pointed it out. I think The Chase has missed in direct out of the question for the answer to be corner.
Apolgise to ThePrisoner.
Law 13The rule applies to both Direct and Indirect free kicks. The correct answer is still a corner.
And no, I don't know why that is the rule, but it is
Roger Never.
Blackpool?
Roger?Roger Never.
Blackpool
Probably the same reason you can kill a Scotsman in York if he is carrying a bow & arrow.Law 13
Ball enters the goal
• if a direct free kick is kicked directly into the opponents’ goal,a goal is awarded
• if an indirect free kick is kicked directly into the opponents’ goal,a goal kick is awarded
• if a direct or indirect free kick is kicked directly into the team’s own goal,a corner kick is awarded
View attachment 65903
I think you've nailed it.Roger?
Never!
Blackpool?
If you are stupid/negative enough to kick a direct freekick towards your own goal you kind of have it coming!Probably something to do with a free kick being given to penalise a team, and it being unsporting for them to gain a goal from a punishment.
Exactly, it makes zero sense for it to be a corner.Yes but this is not a matter of judgment or nuance, like off-side or handball, it is just objectively illogical.