Red Faction - walking out on 30th minute

I still think much of this is about the way it was done as oppose to the increase itself. I know several people saying they can’t afford it who spent £100+ going to Leicester at the weekend and will be spending £200+ going to QPR in a few weeks.

If Gibson and Bausor had been upfront with fans and explained their thinking behind the rises I don’t think there’d have been half the backlash we’re seeing.
Agreed. They could have put a brief apology/ explanation in the renewal email and thanked supporters for their commitment to the cause. That would’ve made the pill easier to swallow. I do think they’ve brought the spotlight on themselves more than it would have been with the tone of the email.
 
People say there would be no club without fans, but there would be no club without gibbo, or it would be scrapping around league two and most of those complaining and walking out wouldn’t be interested.
The club have spent 2 seasons outside the top two tiers and were promoted automatically both times.
Why would MFC be scrapping around league two when it never has been in it's history and when lots of clubs smaller than us are not either?
This narrative that without Gibson we can't survive, let alone thrive is simply not true.
 
If Gibson had expanded the fanbase to the 3bn people that watch English football and don't have a Teesside postcode then he could sell more stuff at a lower price.
That is only going to happen as a premier league club

He's seeing £50 for a shirt, £40 profit and that's it when he should be looking at £50 for a shirt, £20 to the club and £20 to Sports Direct but potentially a fan in London, Manchester, Portsmouth, Bristol etc t
The mark up on football tops is nothing like that and I don't see anyone from Bristol deciding to support boro instead of city. It's unrealistic to see that as a profitable revenue stream, unless we get an attacking team in the prem

It's all his own doing because of decades of mismanagement. It's not the fans fault that he has been **** at his job but it's the fans being asked to pay a premium to cover for his incompetence.
That's a serious over simplification. Of course he has made mistakes Garry Monks transfer policy being a massive one. But anyone in a strategic position will make mistakes

Fans spending more saves him money.
No it doesn't. He cannot put more money into the club than he does due to FFP. It's as simple as that. It saves him nothing.
 
Great point about the Club not showing transparency. Whilst I don't agree with the walk outs, they did shoot themselves with the "immediate" deadline. Sometimes, you do wonder who runs the PR department at that place!
the PR has been poor, and that has been a recurring theme over the years, that is fair.
 
And how is that going Mart?
The club made a fubar when they signed Britt et al. I said at the time Britt wasn't a good signing, most on here loved the ambition. Now they're all complaining that it didn't work. The fans desire for ambition is as much to blame as Gibsons poor decisions.
 
The club have spent 2 seasons outside the top two tiers and were promoted automatically both times.
Why would MFC be scrapping around league two when it never has been in it's history and when lots of clubs smaller than us are not either?
This narrative that without Gibson we can't survive, let alone thrive is simply not true.
He spendds 12m+ per year on keeping the club afloat and has just written off 107m in debts to him. It's very true
 
Here we go the old Tory spin line of if you can afford something above and beyond food, energy, and your council tax then you’re not in poverty.

Going to a football game in the town where you were born and raised should not be an economical choice, how on earth people can justify walk up prices that mean it’s would cost a dad (or mum) and their 2 teenage kids in the region of £70-£80 is ridiculous and that’s before transport and having something to eat.

Football should be accessible to all but unfortunately it currently reflects the rest of society, those than can afford it movk those that can’t.

One club for the community my ****
Based on the example of a parent and two teenagers at £70-£80, where would you suggest the price should be in order for it to never be an economical choice for anyone at all?

I’m not saying that £70-80 for that isn’t expensive, I happen to think it is. I also think the season ticket is expensive, I vote with my wallet (or lack of).

My issue as I have said is using the “in one of the most deprived areas” line as an argument against the increased price of a season ticket.

If the club had announced that they’d slashed the cost of tickets for next season by half, people who are in poverty or deprived still wouldn’t be able to afford it.
 
That is only going to happen as a premier league club
No. That's down to decades of failure to grow the club. We were part of the PL when it was really taking off. We had superstars and we were playing in Europe. We did nothing at the time to expand the fanbase. Other clubs did. He can't do it now because he is too late and all those fans have already picked a club and it's not us which is why we are falling behind and can't catch up.

The mark up on football tops is nothing like that and I don't see anyone from Bristol deciding to support boro instead of city. It's unrealistic to see that as a profitable revenue stream, unless we get an attacking team in the prem
It definitely is. I can get a full kit delivered from China for £10 and they are making a profit. Look at any of the merch compared to the Errea blanks and the mark-up is massive just because there is a Boro badge stuck on. The cost is the same. It's pure mark-up. In any case the numbers are irrelevant, it was an example how margin on its own isn't the full equation and volume x margin seems to be something Gibson and co are totally unaware of.

That's a serious over simplification. Of course he has made mistakes Garry Monks transfer policy being a massive one. But anyone in a strategic position will make mistakes
No, it really isn't. It's simple but it is true. Forget the football side of things. He's said ticket prices are going up to cover minimum wage rises. The football side and the retail/matchday side of things are separate. We can't cover the costs for running a football club because of mismanagement of the processes of running a retail/marketing/ticketing operation. I'm not even talking about the mismanagement of the footballing side of things.

No it doesn't. He cannot put more money into the club than he does due to FFP. It's as simple as that. It saves him nothing.
Of course it saves him. He had to convert £107m debt recently. If the fans had paid the amount they should for a bog standard championship club instead of the amount we are charged then he'd have had to convert more than £107m of debt. For example, if it's £1m a season for 10 years that would have been £117m of debt so he's saved £10m. He's not taking money out but it means he has to put less money in.
 
Actually getting annoyed at people saying the only thing a walk out will effect is the players and the team.

Isn't that exactly the point?!

Show Gibson and the club what happens when the ground is half empty? Which if they carry on this way, it will be all of next season..

The group organising this walkout were there when we had 11k under Mogga/Strachan. It's not the football that's the issue, it's the price.
 
It definitely is. I can get a full kit delivered from China for £10 and they are making a profit. Look at any of the merch compared to the Errea blanks and the mark-up is massive just because there is a Boro badge stuck on. The cost is the same. It's pure mark-up. In any case the numbers are irrelevant, it was an example how margin on its own isn't the full equation and volume x margin seems to be something Gibson and co are totally unaware of.
the cost from a chinese factory isn't what the club will pay to get it from errea, nike, adidas etc. Unless you think we go back to the days of doing our own design and branding and then ship them in cheap direct from factory. That will take a lot of internal skills the club doesn't have such as designers, specialist marketing etc. the markup from any errea, nike, adidas top is small and unless you go with an established brand you will not sell in Sports Direct or anywhere else.
 
Of course it saves him. He had to convert £107m debt recently. If the fans had paid the amount they should for a bog standard championship club instead of the amount we are charged then he'd have had to convert more than £107m of debt. For example, if it's £1m a season for 10 years that would have been £117m of debt so he's saved £10m. He's not taking money out but it means he has to put less money in.
He will still put 1m/month into the club, it saves him nothing.
 
I haven’t seen a single viable method of the club increasing revenue to help cover costs here, other than get rid of the free pint, which might save £30 a ticket
My point isn’t that there are other revenue streams available to the club to cover the costs of operating but rather there is a way of communicating and negating the reasons for needing to look at methods of increasing revenue that isn’t a badly announced increase in prices. If it were me, I would have sent out a survey in November/December explaining the increase in costs to the club, asking for feedback on the matchday experience, how people feel their personal finances will be impacted and get fan opinions on how the cost rise should be recovered.

Without full transparency of revenue accounts no one can say if there are other streams available.

After all that the answer might still be a ticket price increase. But we would all have skin in the game.

On another note - while I totally respect the money Gibson has written off this is a revenue discussion. Just as on field financial decisions are separated so should a large section of the write off spent on squad decisions. Obviously noted that some of that would have been to bridge operation costs.
 
the cost from a chinese factory isn't what the club will pay to get it from errea, nike, adidas etc. Unless you think we go back to the days of doing our own design and branding and then ship them in cheap direct from factory. That will take a lot of internal skills the club doesn't have such as designers, specialist marketing etc. the markup from any errea, nike, adidas top is small and unless you go with an established brand you will not sell in Sports Direct or anywhere else.
The specific numbers are irrelevant. We make massive mark-ups on kits. All clubs do. They cost pennies to make.
 
On another note - while I totally respect the money Gibson has written off this is a revenue discussion. Just as on field financial decisions are separated so should a large section of the write off spent on squad decisions. Obviously noted that some of that would have been to bridge operation costs.
people are accusing Gibson of fleecing the fans and saving himself money, that to me is just wrong and 2 months after he wrote of 107m owed to him it's pretty sad that people resort to that.
 
The specific numbers are irrelevant. We make massive mark-ups on kits. All clubs do. They cost pennies to make.
There's a supply chain. Yes they're fairly cheap to make, although less cheap through the cost of raw materials and delivery of raw materials and energy going through the roof. The manufacturers make the biggest cut, import and export duties hit, shipping costs are increasing massively, haulage costs are up, distribution is up. Our shirts are actually pretty cheap compared to prem clubs but the clubs do not make 40 quid a pop on a shirt or anywhere near that.

Here are two examples of premium brands and premium clubs that will be able to bargain a higher than normal % on shirt deals. Between 7-15% of the price. We won't be able to push for anything near that, probably closer to 5-7%

1708341086757.png
 
Back
Top