LaPennaBianca
Well-known member
This cut in aid will meant that children will die of preventable diseases. Plain and simple.
This is a point that I don't really see being argued elsewhere. It is a percentage of GDP and as this has dropped substantially then the foreign aid budget will drop anyway. Why try for a double drop? Are they looking for headlines to try and show that they are pandering to people who don't realise that foreign aid is really an investment to win overseas contracts?The Tories included the International Aid pledge in their 2019 GE manifesto in spite of a significant number of right leaning voters being against it.
Nobody then could have foreseen the Covid-19 pandemic however it does seem pretty opportunistic to row back on this pledge during a time of economic uncertainty.
It's a % of our GDP regardless of the level of our GDP. It's not like it's a fixed amount.
We are borrowing billions for all sorts of things relating to spending commitments so I'm not sure why International Aid should be reduced.
I'm predicting this will be the next Government u-turn.
Or maybe that's why they're content to see it dropped.This is a point that I don't really see being argued elsewhere. It is a percentage of GDP and as this has dropped substantially then the foreign aid budget will drop anyway. Why try for a double drop? Are they looking for headlines to try and show that they are pandering to people who don't realise that foreign aid is really an investment to win overseas contracts?
I’ve heard of this organisation called the Red Cross, supposedly you can donate to them instead. Or you can just use this as a stick to beat the government with whilst you spend other peoples money playing chancellor from your arm chairs.
I’m happy to pay more tax to help find public services and get people out of poverty in this country rather than keep them in it perpetually, I always have been. Unfortunately I’ll actually be paying less tax next year because of the pay cut I’ve had to take, I’ll also be spending less, saving more and supporting less jobs because this pandemic has shown me I need to take care of myself and my family even more.
I’ve heard of this organisation called the Red Cross, supposedly you can donate to them instead. Or you can just use this as a stick to beat the government with whilst you spend other peoples money playing chancellor from your arm chairs.
I’m happy to pay more tax to help find public services and get people out of poverty in this country rather than keep them in it perpetually, I always have been. Unfortunately I’ll actually be paying less tax next year because of the pay cut I’ve had to take, I’ll also be spending less, saving more and supporting less jobs because this pandemic has shown me I need to take care of myself and my family even more.
This is what happens when a compliant but economically illiterate commentator is briefed by the treasury for political reasons.
BBC accused of 'economic illiteracy and pushing need for Tory austerity'
THE BBC has been accused of “promoting economic illiteracy” after its chief political editor claimed the Tories were being forced into the…www.thenational.scot
Well said Chris. I have every sympathy with UKLLs work predicament. I, like millions of others, have been in the same position and worse. We do not wish other people to suffer because of it though.Is there a charity that we can choose to donate to instead of the government increasing the military budget by £16.5bn?
You taking care of yourself and your family has no impact on our ability and responsibility to help those less fortunate. I've lost all my income and savings, yet there's no way I would want those less fortunate to suffer just because I've been hit financially.
I genuinely believe one is coming anyways regardless of austerity measures or not.If the Government double down on austerity there should be a general strike. Austerity is nothing but a ruse.
She was a Tory mouthpiece during the election and she is a Tory mouthpiece now-Approached for comment, a BBC spokesperson said: "The BBC's political editor is a first-class journalist who provides insightful analysis about key political moments."
Most people don't begrudge giving aid to poor communities overseas, they just want openness about how it is negotiated and distributed. Should we be sending aid to nuclear-armed powers or countries with rich elites?
People in Hong Kong might disagree.Yes, helping those that are in great need should not be stopped just because a country has used its money on other projects or has "elites".
Its in our interest to aid developing countries in becoming stable and prosperous with an educated healthy population, even if they are nuclear armed or have a space agency.
I agree with more transparency though.
Sorry to hear that, I’ve been made redundant before and it’s horrific. I hope you get the support you need and are entitled to.I've lost all my income and savings, yet there's no way I would want those less fortunate to suffer just because I've been hit financially.
People in Hong Kong might disagree.
FWIW the national debt at the end of October was £2,076.8 billion, with tax revenues next year expected to fall to £873 billion.I really cant be doing with this household debt/national debt analogy - Here is a handy cut and keep guide on why its nonsense
Mythbuster: We have to repay the national debt
The myth We have to repay the national debt. Reply The reply - 1 We never have! It's been rising almost constantly since it began. Why should we start repaying it now? The reply - 2 You do know that the national debt includes all our notes and coins? Why do you want to get rid...www.taxresearch.org.uk