Rittenhouse walks!

BoroFur said:
I think you're getting yourself tied up in knots here.
Click to expand...
It's quite simple really.

I concluded there had been no travesty of justice.

You contested my conclusion.

I asked you to demonstrate where the travesty of justice lies.

You replied: "Who mentioned travesty of justice, it wasn't me?"
 
Without the video, Gaige Grosskreutz, would NOT have turned into a defense witness. The video clearly shows he has his gun out pointing at Rittenhouse in close range and admitted on the witness stand that he was only shot after he advanced on the kid AND pointing the gun at him. The press is so biased that even foreign press thought Rittenhouse shot black people— I must admit even I was fooled by the media as I thought he was some sort of vigilante. The judge (Democrat) did a great job, kept his house in order and came to the right decision.
 
dooderooni said:
When your laws allow you to openly carry an assault rifle and grant you the right to use it in a deadly manner to defend yourself then what do you expect?
He may have been shot at first, but under those same criteria I mentioned above, who is to say that shot was not fired in self defence when confronted by a man wielding an assault rifle?
Had Rittenhouse not been there armed with a rifle then the situation would not have occurred.
As for Biden being unhappy with the verdict, that is his right in the US and it should in no way be used as a political device to deviate from the fact that America's gun laws and the second amendment are more akin to the wild west than a modern, civilised society.
Click to expand...
I agree but unfortunately this is America where the culture is so different when it comes to laws and the way that people use the laws to protect themselves. Guns are part of the make up of the country — although I rarely see them being used — it’s not the Wild West or some Clint Eastwood movie even though what goes on in Chicago might seem like it.
 
BlindBoyGrunt said:
It's quite simple really.

I concluded there had been no travesty of justice.

You contested my conclusion.

I asked you to demonstrate where the travesty of justice lies.

You replied: "Who mentioned travesty of justice, it wasn't me?"
Click to expand...
Deary me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top