HarryVegas
Well-known member
Let's imagine he lived on a council estate for one moment. Do we really believe for even one moment that the usual apologists on here would be defending his actions?
This seems to have caused a bit of a stir, may I ask. Do you care about what he has done? Or more about the fact that he has been advising the PM quite successfully and this would be a good opportunity to get rid of him? Just wondering?
Dear me. Just because he has support of number 10 does not mean his actions were correct or were justified. Especially when the incumbent is not known virtue of morality.Confirmed that number 10 support Mr Cummings. The bogey man for the left acted within the rules per the government. This is gonna go into meltdown city.
This most be a joke right? that's the must ludicrous "defence" I've ever seen.Some top level wriggling here to help out the board's own Teesside Tory lickspittles....
View attachment 3196
Apparently genuine. We live in surreal days. The days of Who Needs Experts Anyway, Just Close Your Eyes & BelieveThis most be a joke right? that's the must ludicrous "defence" I've ever seen.
Prosecution: "You murdered him"
Defence: "No I didn't he was alive"
"but he's dead"
"precisely, he was alive when I met him. I then stabbed him, now he's dead. No murder at any point"
IN a rare moment of clarity: Johnson actually said in one speech "children should not be looked after by grandparents or older relatives" One assumes it was actually Cummings that wrote those words.Wow, well none of us saw that coming.
He put a child in a car with two infected people and drove 300 miles to his parents house, breaking just about every rule in the book.
What a F***ing surprise.Confirmed that number 10 support Mr Cummings. The bogey man for the left acted within the rules per the government. This is gonna go into meltdown city.
no PMQs until W/C 1st June as it is Whitsun break - whatever weird Oxford thing that isJohnson must be shítting himself at the prospect of next weeks PMQs if Cummings isn’t going - expect Starmer to dissect him piece by piece on Wednesday. I really can’t see how his actions can be defended, it just makes a mockery of what we’re being told, and quite frankly why should anyone take a blind bit of notice anymore if it’s one rule for the “elite” and another for us
Very handy for Johnson - the devil looks after his own I guessu
no PMQs until W/C 1st June as it is Whitsun break - whatever weird Oxford thing that is
Conveniently Johnson isnt appearing at PQT this Wednesday.Johnson must be shítting himself at the prospect of next weeks PMQs if Cummings isn’t going - expect Starmer to dissect him piece by piece on Wednesday. I really can’t see how his actions can be defended, it just makes a mockery of what we’re being told, and quite frankly why should anyone take a blind bit of notice anymore if it’s one rule for the “elite” and another for us
Ah I see, he lived in one and then the other, then the 1st one again. I suppose on that basis I unwittingly lived in the States for 3 weeks last year
That made me laugh hahaThis most be a joke right? that's the must ludicrous "defence" I've ever seen.
Prosecution: "You murdered him"
Defence: "No I didn't he was alive"
"but he's dead"
"precisely, he was alive when I met him. I then stabbed him, now he's dead. No murder at any point"