Strictly Becomes...,,,

Saw it a few weeks ago and I’m convinced the two blokes must be having it off.

good to see a bit of equality in that the curse can break up gay relationships and all….
 
zorro_mfc said:
It’s not

Calls to the long (11-digit) number from landlines and mobiles cost 15p plus your network’s access charge. To vote from your mobile in the UK, please call the short (7-digit) number announced for your chosen couple. Calls from mobiles to the short (7-digit) number cost 15p per vote and should cost less than calling the long (11-digit) number from your mobile so please, if you can, dial the short (7-digit) number from your mobile. You cannot text and you cannot dial the short (7-digit) number from a landline.
Click to expand...
Ok apologies my bad. It’s free to vote on line and my point re lack of rehearsal time as the reason for no replacement couple still stands. Nothing to do with any legal issue re previous votes.
 
Zoophonic said:
Ok apologies my bad. It’s free to vote on line and my point re lack of rehearsal time as the reason for no replacement couple still stands. Nothing to do with any legal issue re previous votes.
Click to expand...
You can vote online for free……
 
Just been watching Newswatch which is just a load of fuddy duddies calling in to complain about all and sundry. There were some this morning saying the BBC were giving too much coverage to partygate. Obviously Stanley Johnson and his mates ringing in.

Anyway there were some who made a valid point about Strictly. It’s given far too much prominence in the BBC news bulletins. They are effectively promoting their own entertainment show as the news. Appreciate that the nation view it as an institution but is it really that big that it dominates news channels in the way it does?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top