Salmons needs to find evidence the 29th March meeting took place, otherwise it’s all hot air.
One of them will be.Well if he's under oath and 'talking hot air' like you wish were true ... He'd be perjuring himself.
Well no @Yearbyred Nicola went with (and this is paraphrasing)
'Alex is a crazy conspiracy theorist'
So it's not fair to say we've only had one side.
The sort of wacky conspiracy theory that Trump's acolytes would be proud of.westminister is worried about the May elections - this is all part of a game to stop a SNP landslide victory.
its a dirty game is politics - and theres non better at playing the dirty war than London.
westminister is worried about the May elections - this is all part of a game to stop a SNP landslide victory.
its a dirty game is politics - and theres non better at playing the dirty war than London.
Good meat on my bonesSure @Ebor, so this relates to the sexual misconduct charge against Salmond (he has been acquited) in summary Alex Salmons claims under oath:-
That senior members of the SNP including Sturgeons husband colluded and 'constructed' evidence against him. He has evidence of this in the form of messages that were turned over to him in the disclosure process.
That Sturgeon misled parliament (holyrood) by lying about when she knew about the charges against Salmond.
That he (Salmond) had been treatened by the Crown office (Scotland's CPS) to limit the scope of his investigation and that its not independent, misused legislation to block the provision of evidence.
Finally Salmond claimed that the government had been told months prior that they were going to lose yet kept on going. Another breach of ministerial code.