The 9am figures not disclosed yet?

Being outdoors does, you're totally right on that, and the common sense of that is right, it will have an effect. The problem is it will only have an effect in that time period (maybe spending 2 hours per day more outside, so maybe 3 hours outside in summer average, compared to 1 hour winter average?), but that gain gets taken away by the 8x transmissibility increase (over wild variant) when you're inside for the other 21 hours.

Fag packet maths says you may need to spend 8 x more outside, to make up for the 8 x transmissibility, on the rough assumption that there's zero chance of catching it outside etc.

For Flu and the wild strain with R0's of 0.5-3, seasonality will have a much more noticeable effect, but BA2 won't, and neither did BA1, even Delta didn't, it's all about timing, when it arrives, that's when the wave hits. Look how it kicked off in South Africa, which was in the middle of summer, and the only reason it hit here in winter is because it arrived in winter, then it just burns out quick when it reaches an infection level high enough to counter the R0 (which was in winter). The reason for the second wave in March was timing again, BA2 having a higher R0, so again needing a higher infection rate to curb it (despite weather being slightly better).

The driver of the next wave will probably be waning immunity, but as that is probably well staggered, then this may help us avoid further large waves.

I don't think Covid will go away (as in become extinct), it was here before anyone had even heard of it (I hadn't heard of it in 2018 anyway), and the R0's are that high now that it will just circle around the world, finding gaps, infecting people who somehow avoided it, and reinfecting others, just like common colds/ flu does, it will probably go on forever. The impact of it will likely just get less and less and less, as vaccines and previous infection, and reinfection, and reinfection will just build up a massive resistance to the threat, it will just merge with colds and flu etc, and to me it already has. It's already less deadly than typical flu (only due to vaccines and prev infection etc), which is to me where we pretty much have to draw a line under it and largely forget about it (for those without immunity issues). If I had immunity issues I'd probably be very careful, to reduce risk, but may eventually give up on that just to feel more "normal", hard to say though, as I'm not in that boat and feel sorry for those who are.

Loads will die next winter, they always do it's been called EWM (excess winter mortality) for years, but I just don't see it being worse than an average flu year. Of course, that's still pretty crap, but surely this will have been a good lesson in how dangerous it can be passing on colds, flu, Covid to the elderly and those at risk. Maybe some will give up meeting the parents for crimbo dinner if the have some symptoms, which could end up saving quite a few lives which we otherwise would not have saved.

I appreciate the comments, it's been an interesting debate, and I've learned a lot over the last couple of years, and tried to pass some of that on, as best I can anyway :LOL:



No need to apologise, I saw nothing wrong with that!

I know what you mean (y)
I read all that quite carefully, and I agree to an extent. Still common sense often trumps science, and that's from a scientist.

On the excess deaths, we did this previously, but I think covid will make flu and pneumonia look like a sniffle every winter until we vastly improve, either the treatment or the vaccine.

You are right that it may just become the new normal though. Rather unfortunately.
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 212 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, down from 228 on Friday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test increases by 16.3% to 216.0 per day, following 0.9% increase on Friday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 24.0% higher than one week ago (from 16.7% lower on Friday) and 34.2% lower than two weeks ago (from 33.5% lower on Friday and 5.4% lower 7 days ago)

Apologies, but these are actually yesterday's figures (I was busy with work yesterday). The government is now only publishing UK wide figures on a Monday and Thursday, so it's down to twice weekly updates from now on.
 
I read all that quite carefully, and I agree to an extent. Still common sense often trumps science, and that's from a scientist.

On the excess deaths, we did this previously, but I think covid will make flu and pneumonia look like a sniffle every winter until we vastly improve, either the treatment or the vaccine.

You are right that it may just become the new normal though. Rather unfortunately.
Yeah, I know what you mean, and common sense does (sometimes), but to me, all the seasonality does is buy you time, might be a year at R0 of 2, might be 5 minutes at an R0 of 16.

I think it's already the new Normal, and has been since Omicron, and the relatively small damage it did, from an absolutely massive amount of cases, the IFR shows this. I think Covid/ Flu/ Colds etc will just blend together in peoples eyes, there's potential for it to be worse for excess, but then again there's only so many people who would be at major risk. Then it's down to how excess is measured, last 5 years, or using 2015-2019, which was based on a different data set.
 
Yeah, I know what you mean, and common sense does (sometimes), but to me, all the seasonality does is buy you time, might be a year at R0 of 2, might be 5 minutes at an R0 of 16.

I think it's already the new Normal, and has been since Omicron, and the relatively small damage it did, from an absolutely massive amount of cases, the IFR shows this. I think Covid/ Flu/ Colds etc will just blend together in peoples eyes, there's potential for it to be worse for excess, but then again there's only so many people who would be at major risk. Then it's down to how excess is measured, last 5 years, or using 2015-2019, which was based on a different data set.
I agree with your thoughts. Here's what worries me. Next winter covid may well be back with a vengance. There may be other mutations and ultimately we are going to be moving to a "new normal" with excess deaths. I think a tory goverrnment, if we still have one next winter, will again do very little in an attempt to protect business profits. Our parents and grandparents will pay the price.

We need a strategy now for next winter or life expectancy will fall for the first time since the 1850's.

You and me will be fine, we are still reasonably young but a final thought from me. Deaths and hospitalizations have been very stubborn when it comes to dropping and most predictions had us well below 200 deaths a day by now. On the flip side, they climb very rapidly.
 
I agree with your thoughts. Here's what worries me. Next winter covid may well be back with a vengance. There may be other mutations and ultimately we are going to be moving to a "new normal" with excess deaths. I think a tory goverrnment, if we still have one next winter, will again do very little in an attempt to protect business profits. Our parents and grandparents will pay the price.

We need a strategy now for next winter or life expectancy will fall for the first time since the 1850's.

You and me will be fine, we are still reasonably young but a final thought from me. Deaths and hospitalizations have been very stubborn when it comes to dropping and most predictions had us well below 200 deaths a day by now. On the flip side, they climb very rapidly.
There might be mutations, but what are the chances of it being more transmissible than BA2, or getting any more dangerous? Probably not all that likely, and even if so the chances of a big effect (comparative to other times of excess) are probably quite slim, now that we seem to be hitting an immunity wall, big enough to overcome the massive R0 of Omicron. What we mind find is there are some more dangerous strains, but it's going to be extremely unlikely to beat 3 x exposures which probably most are nearing now and 3 or more vaccinations, which is what most will have.

I'm about as certain as I can be, that we won't reach anywhere near the levels of April 20 or Jan 21 etc, as I just don't see how we could get those sort of numbers (albeit I'm obviously not an epidemiologist).

There is always a trade off between economy (better for most peoples lives)/ Covid measures (better for the at risk), and I think they have it right now, but were far from it (on a ridiculous level) for most of 20 and early 21. I think they've learnt enough now what is the best "balance", or I really hope they have.

Life expectancy probably can't keep increasing forever and a pandemic/ aftermath is probably a fair reason to have a drop, if there ever was one. Long covid will probably do some damage to that as well, but that could take decades to play out, and will be hard to tell how much of a factor that is/ was.

I think a lot of the halt of predicted falls were down to the second bump of BA2, but recent numbers are skewed by a change in reporting, as well as the BH's etc. 200 is still bad mind, but we're still below excess, so that 200 might be instead of say 300 from flu or whatever.

Going by date of death the curve is quite clear, but the peak is probably delayed more than it used to, as treatment is better, so most make it, or last longer?

The nature of exponential growth is once things pick up pace, they increase at an alarming level, but then with decay, the fall of comparative numbers can't maintain a linear regression, so ends up a classic bell curve.
 
Still no further update to deaths published on the Covid dashboard. There's been a problem with the data for Northern Ireland which means they can't publish updated UK-wide figures.
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 153 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, slightly up from 151 on Friday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test decreases by 5.6% to 140.9 per day, following 6.9% decrease on Friday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 34.8% lower than one week ago (from 20.0% lower on Friday) and 19.1% lower than two weeks ago (from 33.3% lower on Friday and 34.2% lower 7 days ago)
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 169 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, up from 126 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test decreases by 2.1% to 112.7 per day, following 9.1% decrease yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 29.4% lower than one week ago (from 41.1% lower yesterday) and 38.7% lower than two weeks ago (from 26.6% lower yesterday and 31.4% lower 7 days ago)
 
Today's headline analysis:

• 169 new deaths within 28 days of a positive test reported in 24-hour period, up from 126 yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test decreases by 2.1% to 112.7 per day, following 9.1% decrease yesterday
• 7-day average for new deaths within 28 days of a positive test is 29.4% lower than one week ago (from 41.1% lower yesterday) and 38.7% lower than two weeks ago (from 26.6% lower yesterday and 31.4% lower 7 days ago)
The daily figures are all over the place now, and being so low open to big swings/ variance for the days they're announced, not reflecting the actual date of death. The 7 day av is quite messy too, and laggy.

I just look at the deaths by date of death now (and not often), and it's looking good, we're probably looking at ~80 per day for a realistic average now, but won't get shown due to lag. Last confirmed day of finished reporting was the 14th, and that was only 77.

1652975647774.png


Same with admissions, down, down, down and that's a good insight to where deaths are going for the next 10-14 days.
1652975844158.png
 
Last edited:
As of today, the government has stopped publishing Covid data on a UK-wide basis. This is the latest in a series of changes which has undermined the integrity and usefulness of the data in recent months.

They are still publishing data for England and I could create new spreadsheets and download all the various data sets to give a historical comparative on that basis. However, now feels like it might be an appropriate point to stop posting the updates.

Thoughts?
 
As of today, the government has stopped publishing Covid data on a UK-wide basis. This is the latest in a series of changes which has undermined the integrity and usefulness of the data in recent months.

They are still publishing data for England and I could create new spreadsheets and download all the various data sets to give a historical comparative on that basis. However, now feels like it might be an appropriate point to stop posting the updates.

Thoughts?
I agree Billy. Thanks for your efforts over the last couple of years. And the same to Bear, God rest his soul.
 
As of today, the government has stopped publishing Covid data on a UK-wide basis. This is the latest in a series of changes which has undermined the integrity and usefulness of the data in recent months.

They are still publishing data for England and I could create new spreadsheets and download all the various data sets to give a historical comparative on that basis. However, now feels like it might be an appropriate point to stop posting the updates.

Thoughts?
Time to stop I think. As you say the data is getting less useful. Thanks for all the work you've put in to this. Even though the news was often grim I found it both fascinating and comforting to read your analysis. It helped me understand what was happening
 
As of today, the government has stopped publishing Covid data on a UK-wide basis. This is the latest in a series of changes which has undermined the integrity and usefulness of the data in recent months.

They are still publishing data for England and I could create new spreadsheets and download all the various data sets to give a historical comparative on that basis. However, now feels like it might be an appropriate point to stop posting the updates.

Thoughts?
I'd say stop, with the hard work/ effort at least, but maybe keep popping in for an update every now and then? Thanks for your updates up to now, like ST says, it's been a grim topic, but interesting to some.

To me this is pretty much done mind, we're now at less world deaths (7 day Av) than when we locked down in March 20 (not been below 5k since really), and look like we're just about to break <1000 per day, and that's with better knowledge, monitoring, testing etc.

Current world Covid deaths say 6.3m over the last 2 and a half years, but we're realistically at treble that. Been a painful ride but now it's lost significance compared to other health/ world problems.
 
Back
Top