Would you start Rogers against Norwich?
- Thread starter parmoboy
- Start date
Druss_The_Legend
Well-known member
Coburn spends most of his time on the pitch roughing up and wearing down the opposition defence(Crooks also can be a bit rough and ready in the attacking mid role), so when Latte Lath and Rogers are brought on with the speed they bring to the match the defence is that knackered that we create chances late on.
I think that job that Coburn does in unsettling defenders is important first half. And he'll pop up with goals too. Bringing Lathe on with 30 to go, when central defenders are tiring is a decent plan ... and worked a treat yesterday.
Greenwood was a bit anonymous yesterday, and, as mentioned above, he did seem a bit slow to make the runs that Hackney and Barlaser were looking for from him (perhaps wary of the offside trap). But he was energetic and niggly when they had the ball. Having said that, I think Rogers is good and getting better, so either or for me ... or McGree.
I can't see Smith recovering from ligament damage any time soon. VDB if wanting to be solid. Anfernee if creativity going forward is what's needed. With him, Crooks and Jones on the right there are all kinds of options.
Greenwood was a bit anonymous yesterday, and, as mentioned above, he did seem a bit slow to make the runs that Hackney and Barlaser were looking for from him (perhaps wary of the offside trap). But he was energetic and niggly when they had the ball. Having said that, I think Rogers is good and getting better, so either or for me ... or McGree.
I can't see Smith recovering from ligament damage any time soon. VDB if wanting to be solid. Anfernee if creativity going forward is what's needed. With him, Crooks and Jones on the right there are all kinds of options.