uncle_rico
Well-known member
This saga is going to rumble on all month.
Silly man, he can only leave if a team wishes to buy him. He isn't being forced to stay against his wishes, as far as I am aware.
Sources closer to Spurs than Fabrizio and Skysports suggest he's waiting to hear back from a negative covid test and should report into training tomorrow if the test is negative.
He doesn't come across as that type of person/player, so I would be shocked if he started pulling these type of stunts.i reckon there is more to it than he just hasnt turned up
Costa and Kane up top, gotta feel for big Uche, from first to third choice in one day...............On the same day we agree a fee to sell Akpom. No coincidence. A decent replacement and will offer good back up to big Uche!
It's not the behaviour you would expect from the England captain.If he thought Levy was going to stick to any "gentleman's agreement" he's dafter than he looks.
Appreciate he wants to go to a club with a better (almost guaranteed) chance of winning trophies, but agree with Teacider, shouldn't have signed such a long contract. Or at least negotiated a release clause or something.
Badly advised maybe? Or just naive?
Kane should respect the contract he willingly signed and not mess his employers about.Spurs should respect Kane wishes. Do not mess him about. Just accept that bid then use that money to sign few players that Spurs really need.
Kane should respect he contract he willingly signed and not mess his employers about.
If there is a verbal agreement - how does anyone prove such an agreement exists if there's no witness to it???depends on what was agreed with Levy for leaving, a verbal agreement can still be legally binding, you could equally argue it’s his employer messing him around by reneging on their agreement.
I’m not convinced it’s being reported accurately anyway.