I'm not saying they would have won the league if they'd won those matches. I'm saying they've thrown it away because they couldn't handle the pressure. It doesn't matter what expectations were at the start of the season, it matters what they were at 2-0 up at Liverpool, 2-0 up at West Ham and at kick off against the worst team in the league. There would have been no bottling if they had gradually dropped points along the way and City relentlessly kept on winning. The manner of the fall is what is important.This is crazy talk.
Even if they beat Liverpool, West Ham & Saints, they weren't guaranteed of the title.
This is a side that finished 5th last season and who Arteta has punching well above their weight (both based on last season, and based on financial side of things - wages spent etc).
And then you're blaming Arteta for this?
Arteta is in the running for Manager of the Season - and rightly so. This Arsenal team - based on their experience and age - shouldn't really have been in the position they were. No one would've predicted them to be top in April.
They've over achieved in the league enormously and a lot of credit has to go to Arteta for that. Especially with the injuries to big keys players this season - none more so than Jesus.
They're up against a winning machine, and arguably the greatest manager of all time - and if City win the treble, they could even be beaten by arguably the greatest English side team ever.
To suggest Arsenal have 100% bottled it is completely wrong.
I'm not "blaming" Arteta. I'm saying he also doesn't have the experience. Like his young squad he/they haven't been in the pressure situation of having to win every week while another team chases you down. He's had a great season. Arsenal have had a great season. They've massively exceeded expectations but expectations change. 4 games ago they were in a position where they could win the league by matching City and losing the City match. They didn't win any of them, when they definitely should have done, and they got battered by City. City are/were irrelevant. It didn't matter that they might beat Arsenal because it was still in Arsenal's hands. Even if they'd won 2 and drawn one of the 3 they'd still be in control. They might have not been able to keep up the form to beat City to the title but they looked like they've already given up and they see it as inevitable from kick-off against City.
If Arteta had been in this situation before he might have been able to relay his experiences to his players. He's going through it for the first time as well. There's no shame in it. This experience will help in the future. He/they will learn from it. Maybe a more experienced head would have managed them through the last few games better. Losing a 2 goal lead once happens. It's not ideal but it happens. 2 in a row is a problem and then to find yourself 2 down in 15 mins at home in a must win game the following week is a capitulation.
You can have a great season and still bottle it. In fact, you can only bottle something if you have something, like a lead, to lose.