Boro's number 9 - Latte Lath

To the tune of the chorus of Physical by the great Olivia Newton John:-

Boro’s got Latte-Lath, Latte-Lath
I wanna see Latte-Lath
We all love Latte-Lath
Let me hear the Boro Roar, the Boro Roar
Watching Latte-Lath score

Boro’s got Latte-Lath, Latte-Lath
We all love Latte-Lath
Let me hear the Boro Roar, the Boro Roar
Watching Latte-Lath score, Latte-Lath score

repeat…. at will
 
If that is us done, he is the No9, Rogers is the 10 and we go with Forss, McGree, Jones and Silvera covering the wide positions then we have really gone backwards.

Surely it can't be?
 
This guy can play on the right as well. It's good to have a goalscorer in one of the wide positions and we know that Carrick favours this so I imagine he will get games there and that the club will be looking for another striker. Whether they get one remains to be seen.
 
If that is us done, he is the No9, Rogers is the 10 and we go with Forss, McGree, Jones and Silvera covering the wide positions then we have really gone backwards.

Surely it can't be?
Common sense would suggest not, but this is Boro and recruitment that we are talking about. 🤔
 
I see people whinging and moaning on other places saying well that's us not getting in another forward, Latte was brought in to replace Archer not Akpom, Rogers will fill the role of Akpom unless we get a new number 10 in. I really wonder if some people just love a good whinge and moan.
It's more that the Chuba money has gone on latte lath, an unproven Championship or unproven good level forward, and Archer (who would have got more than 20 in a full season) has been swapped for Rogers who has 2 goals in 34 championship appearances. If you think of it like goals per year, and the two out are replaced by the two in, then those two need to get 50 goals, which has to be seen as unlikely.

I'm usually very optimistic, but I'm a bit disheartened at the minute. I hope they all prove me wrong, but even if they do that we will still need to get some good loans and other transfers in, as we need a couple more key players and a couple more for squad depth.
 
It's more that the Chuba money has gone on latte lath, an unproven Championship or unproven good level forward, and Archer (who would have got more than 20 in a full season) has been swapped for Rogers who has 2 goals in 34 championship appearances. If you think of it like goals per year, and the two out are replaced by the two in, then those two need to get 50 goals, which has to be seen as unlikely.

I'm usually very optimistic, but I'm a bit disheartened at the minute. I hope they all prove me wrong, but even if they do that we will still need to get some good loans and other transfers in, as we need a couple more key players and a couple more for squad depth.
The thing is Andy there pretty much is squad depth. There is just not nearly enough quality.
3xGK
2xRB (Smith, Dijksteel)
2xLB (Engels, Coulson)
5x CB (inc McNair and Clarke)
4x CM (inc Payero and Barlaser)
2x LW (McGree & Silvera)
2x No10 (Rogers, Gilbert)
2x RW (Forss, Jones)
3x CF (LL, Crooks, Coburn)

That is 25 players already. That is without academy players emerging.
If more come in, then some will leave.
 
It sounded to me from the press conference that Carrick really rates him. The no.9 is certainly a confidence booster isn't it. This guy can cut it.
I hope he gets off to a fast start and immediately gets that connection with the fans. I took from the training video that he has a big beaming smile and it could light up the riverside!
 
The thing is Andy there pretty much is squad depth. There is just not nearly enough quality.
3xGK
2xRB (Smith, Dijksteel)
2xLB (Engels, Coulson)
5x CB (inc McNair and Clarke)
4x CM (inc Payero and Barlaser)
2x LW (McGree & Silvera)
2x No10 (Rogers, Gilbert)
2x RW (Forss, Jones)
3x CF (LL, Crooks, Coburn)

That is 25 players already. That is without academy players emerging.
If more come in, then some will leave.
1692374171360.png

1692374390944.png
 
Back
Top