Carrick

B_G said:
I'm not getting at him. I actually don't mind him either. He's feisty and has a bit of talent

But

Is he better than mcgree on the left? No

Is he better than Crooks/Rogers at no10? No (TBC if he's better than azaz)

He's playing ST because we have no one else
Click to expand...
McGree has been injured.. so yes
We don’t have Crooks or Rogers.. so yes
We don’t have anyone to play RW by the looks of it.
 
Some fair points on here. Carrick is learning his trade, I’m sure he’ll be massively disappointed with how things went today. Back to the drawing board tomorrow and hopefully some fresh ideas and players for midweek
 
LeeMiller said:
How can a club with a much vaunted recruitment team continue to put a team on the pitch without a recognised CF*

At one stage we had three loan players in the pitch from teams within the same division as us.

Not a great selection of players available to Carrick today. But he chose Hackney to play where he did and not start McGree. That’s on him. Also Barlaser was having a very poor day, but didn’t take him off. Maybe man management and looking after the individual but the team was not good enough today in any department



* I only count Lath and Coburn and they are both consistently injured and inconsistent in performance when fit.
Click to expand...
Scott said on the 12th man pod that he see's Lath, Coburn, Forss and Greenwood as strikers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top