England ladies were magnificent !

Women's football is still very low quality but a lot of that will improve over time.
Only if people keep comparing it to the men's game.

The Women's World Cup is the absolute cream of the crop, for women. The Men's World Cup is the absolute cream of the crop, for men.

The women's game is improving, and so is the men's. The women's game will never catch up with the men's, and its unfair to expect it do so. I would only see an issue with goal sizes if there were too many goals being scored, but there aren't, and its the same for both teams. Even if there more goals in the women's game, its only comparisons with the men's game that decipher that.

I think comparing it to the men's game is futile. Women's high hurdle races are different because women have a different stride length, its not about the 'spectacle' of it or to make them look as good as the men. The 100m sprint is exactly the same for men and women. When Shelley-Ann Fraser Pryce wins people say 'she's the fastest woman in the world', they don't immediately leap to 'ah that was low quality, Usain Bolt went a whole second quicker, we should expect better'. Its futile.
 
Last edited:
It really isn't.
It definitely is. Passes are less accurate, tactics are poor, technique is poor.

I didn't see the match today because I was working but I've seen the highlights. The first was a very good finish but there was 1 goal because the keeper was too small, 1 was an aimless long ball which the defenders let bounce multiple times and another came from an inexplicable scorpion kick attempt in midfield, a midfielder running past the player with the ball to let the player have a free run through the middle, the defenders were then completely in the wrong position playing the only attacker onside and the keeper stayed on their line instead of closing the angle.

There are regularly goals scored in men's football due to individual mistakes but rarely do you get 5 or 6 mistakes within the same passage of play. The ability to kick a ball cleanly isn't the only thing which determines the standard of football. The general attacking passages of play, defending and especially the goalkeeping is very low.

I fully expect it to get better over time as more and more people play and are coached by high quality coaches from a young age but at the moment the standard is still very low. I'm not saying Sunday League or anything so disrespectful but it's the sort of football you see in the lower leagues or in youth football.
 
That second goal for England was absolutely appalling defending unbelievably bad. All that a side they beat the aussies so well done
 
It definitely is. Passes are less accurate, tactics are poor, technique is poor.

I didn't see the match today because I was working but I've seen the highlights. The first was a very good finish but there was 1 goal because the keeper was too small, 1 was an aimless long ball which the defenders let bounce multiple times and another came from an inexplicable scorpion kick attempt in midfield, a midfielder running past the player with the ball to let the player have a free run through the middle, the defenders were then completely in the wrong position playing the only attacker onside and the keeper stayed on their line instead of closing the angle.

There are regularly goals scored in men's football due to individual mistakes but rarely do you get 5 or 6 mistakes within the same passage of play. The ability to kick a ball cleanly isn't the only thing which determines the standard of football. The general attacking passages of play, defending and especially the goalkeeping is very low.

I fully expect it to get better over time as more and more people play and are coached by high quality coaches from a young age but at the moment the standard is still very low. I'm not saying Sunday League or anything so disrespectful but it's the sort of football you see in the lower leagues or in youth football.
Respectfully, and this is coming from someone who has been watching women's football since 2011, you're talking absolute b***ks.
 
It definitely is. Passes are less accurate, tactics are poor, technique is poor.

I didn't see the match today because I was working but I've seen the highlights. The first was a very good finish but there was 1 goal because the keeper was too small, 1 was an aimless long ball which the defenders let bounce multiple times and another came from an inexplicable scorpion kick attempt in midfield, a midfielder running past the player with the ball to let the player have a free run through the middle, the defenders were then completely in the wrong position playing the only attacker onside and the keeper stayed on their line instead of closing the angle.

There are regularly goals scored in men's football due to individual mistakes but rarely do you get 5 or 6 mistakes within the same passage of play. The ability to kick a ball cleanly isn't the only thing which determines the standard of football. The general attacking passages of play, defending and especially the goalkeeping is very low.

I fully expect it to get better over time as more and more people play and are coached by high quality coaches from a young age but at the moment the standard is still very low. I'm not saying Sunday League or anything so disrespectful but it's the sort of football you see in the lower leagues or in youth football.
The third goal came from great play by Hemp and a great finish from Russo to take advantage of Australia having a lot of players forward as they were chasing the game.

-Hemp picks up the ball and turns away from the midfielder.
-The defender is running back into position as the midfielder puts in that challenge. If she commits herself into a challenge as well and Hemp beats her, it's three against three.
-One defender comes out to pressure Hemp, Russo holds her run to stay onside.
-Hemp plays the ball through, Russo seems quite wide. Toone is making a run into the box on the far side. The keeper can't close the angle any further as Russo could play the ball across to Toone who has an open goal. She isn't expecting the first time shot either as it seems like it's not the best angle to take the shot.

Was the defending perfect, no, but you can say that for pretty much any goal at any level. But it definitely wasn't an error by the keeper, nor does a midfielder run past a player with the ball to give her a run at goal. Defensive errors always happen in the 70+ minute point of any game - especially when they're pushing forward to get back into the game.

I really don't see the reason for comparing it to any level of men's football. But I watch men's football and women's football regularly, and I see bad games at the top level of both. And good games at the top and lower levels of both. If you don't enjoy it, that's fine, but putting forward defensive errors late in a game as an example of women's football being of a poor standard is a bit rediculous.
 
That second goal for England was absolutely appalling defending unbelievably bad.
A bit like Roberto Baggio's (best player in the world at the time) penalty miss in the biggest match of them all.

I'm not saying you are doing this G_E, but a lot is made of mistakes in the women's game. They happen in the men's too, comically so at times. Comparing the frequency of it etc really isn't worth doing.

They're the best players in the world (from the female cohort of players).
 
It’s definitely better than it was but still rubbish to watch especially the joke keepers. That’s just my opinion and I hope they go on to win it.
 
Umm...reminds me of Lineker's goal against Germany in 1990, when he was surrounded by three defenders.
Yeah, I thought the same. Wasn't all that different. I thought Hemp showed a lot of good strength and anticipation to help make that mistake happen.
 
Back
Top