Fiona Bruce

Are you nuts? There was no whataboutery. Randy pointed out that the language used by Sexpom is not helpful and he is right.
Its yours and a conspiracy nuts opinion. I will continue to call out scum when I see it. Maybe your crusade against Smalltown should stop as well.
 
Last edited:
Just that mate, a new member, but some on here seem to like to have a go at new members for some reason.... The usual suspects!
well you've just hung yourself out to dry, if you really were a new member you wouldn't know who the 'usual suspects' are, my word you've done yourself up like a kipper. He can go back on block can't be bothered with that one again.
 
well you've just hung yourself out to dry, if you really were a new member you wouldn't know who the 'usual suspects' are, my word you've done yourself up like a kipper. He can go back on block can't be bothered with that one again.
TBF he didn't use the word "clique" so maybe he's learning.
 
Its yours and a conspiracy nuts opinion. I will continue to call out scum when I see it. Maybe your crusade against Smalltown should stop as well.
It isn't a crusade, I agree with him when he posts a sensible point. Telling a poster that he supports domestic abuse because he questioned your juvenile language, is not supporting domestic abuse. SmallTown suggested it did just that.

If you don't want your posts challenged, don't post
 
It isn't a crusade, I agree with him when he posts a sensible point. Telling a poster that he supports domestic abuse because he questioned your juvenile language, is not supporting domestic abuse. SmallTown suggested it did just that.

If you don't want your posts challenged, don't post
Taken in isolation, yes that makes sense. I don't want to put words into has mouth but it's probably because you see fit to jump on almost every post I do to attack, from brexit to EV to this. I still disagree with your assessment of Randy's tacit defence of Bruce but that's fine in this case, you're welcome to that opinion.
Lime I sad that's why the tacit defence is so clever by people. They can say pretty nasty nasty things in a way that isn't explicitly nasty and therefore use the "quote me" defence after.

Liem I said though, I've come to accept your behaviour now. I will just have to live with the constant jibes. I don't really care, jsut as long as they don't derail threads.
 
well you've just hung yourself out to dry, if you really were a new member you wouldn't know who the 'usual suspects' are, my word you've done yourself up like a kipper. He can go back on block can't be bothered with that one again.
Haaaa so, I need to be a member to see who the usual suspect are hey! Ohh yeah, like a right Kipper!!
 
Taken in isolation, yes that makes sense. I don't want to put words into has mouth but it's probably because you see fit to jump on almost every post I do to attack, from brexit to EV to this. I still disagree with your assessment of Randy's tacit defence of Bruce but that's fine in this case, you're welcome to that opinion.
Lime I sad that's why the tacit defence is so clever by people. They can say pretty nasty nasty things in a way that isn't explicitly nasty and therefore use the "quote me" defence after.

Liem I said though, I've come to accept your behaviour now. I will just have to live with the constant jibes. I don't really care, jsut as long as they don't derail threads.
See the thing is ST, you are doubling down there. It's an attack on Randy's personality based purely on speculation. You cannot know, and no reasonable person would conclude that the only thing Randy meant to do was defend domestic abuse, or indeed just Fiona Bruce.

This is why I got involved in the first place, not because it was you. I react to the post, not the poster.
 
See the thing is ST, you are doubling down there. It's an attack on Randy's personality based purely on speculation. You cannot know, and no reasonable person would conclude that the only thing Randy meant to do was defend domestic abuse, or indeed just Fiona Bruce.

This is why I got involved in the first place, not because it was you. I react to the post, not the poster.
Yeah, like I said you can easily have that opinion in this case. I disagree as I've seen too many internet posts of this type, where someone tacitly tries to get a suspect point across. That's fine we don't agree on this one. As I said the "crusade" line was probably because you will take a line against me on pretty much any subject you care to mention. I'm glad others have noticed it too.
 
Yeah, like I said you can easily have that opinion in this case. I disagree as I've seen too many internet posts of this type, where someone tacitly tries to get a suspect point across. That's fine we don't agree on this one. As I said the "crusade" line was probably because you will take a line against me on pretty much any subject you care to mention. I'm glad others have noticed it too.
Nope, I think EV's are crap, hence my ev position. On other contentious issues, it's the line you take. I play the post not the man, despite what you may think.
 
Back
Top