Has the Freeport been a "Huge success"?

Jonny Ingbar

Well-known member
Because Sunak keeps telling us that it is.

I'm prepared to be educated, but what tangible benefit have we seen?
 
As real as "Labour's meat tax". But it's been a very real benefit for the business men who bought the land for £96 and sold it on for.... what was it, £20 million?
Have they actually sold it? I thought they had leased the land out and then sold the rights to the lease money for a lump sum payment while retaining ownership of the land?
 
It's murky as hell and what Houchen says doesn't add up. Which is pretty standard as he is a massive liar.

So the developers have sold the rights for the SeAH land for lease for 40 years for tens of millions of pounds.

That leaseholder then leases it back to the local authority for £3.65m a year who then lease it to SeAH for £650K profit so £4.3m a year.

Apparently SeAH will also pay business rates of £7m a year on this, which makes me wonder what the Freeport benefit is as that's equivalent to around 20-25% of the current Redcar and Cleveland Council business rates revenue.

I don't believe that figure. 2 reasons - firstly business rates aren't that high - I don't see how you square them being a quarter of the total of the expected total take from the site eventually. Secondly it's all a bit fake anyway. The government will be paying their rates for them until 2035 and under the Freeport deal, the council only gets half the money.
 
Ignoring the whole Musgrave/Corney situation, as there is clearly questions to be asked there, the freeport appears to have been a success doesn't it?

The first phase of the new quay is almost complete with plans for the second phase next year.
Seah Monopile factory is well on the way, currently in excess of 300 persons on siite.
Other projects on the horizon with the new hydrogen plant sounding like it is progressing.

Not sure whether these are all due to it being a freeport or not but the Teesworks redevelopment seems to be moving on nicely.
 
Back
Top