Johnson summoning Savile in HOC

Well his cult followers are all over social media saying Starmer was in charge so the buck stops with him today.

Bozo knows exactly what he is doing when he spouts this rubbish people believe it & Starmer cannot do a thing because its said in the chamber the only person who could do anything at all would be the speaker but Hoyle is about as much use as a wet lettuce.

Bozo can spout crap like this which is a lie but the speaker kicks out anyone who calls this cretin what he is a lair.
 
I dislike Boris Johnson immensely

But I’m increasingly finding some of the swearing and descriptive language I read on here distasteful.

Don’t throw insults. It debases your argument.

this post isn’t aimed at anyone in particular.
 
Is there no end to this person who sits at the head of the Government of our country

Do we really have 2 more years of this before we can cast them out.

I can`t bring myself now to watch PMQ's because it`s just pointless, all the lies and smears and still not been brought to account for it

Faith in UK politics has almost vanished, all the blows he has taken and he still stands.......beggars belief
 
Is there no end to this person who sits at the head of the Government of our country

Do we really have 2 more years of this before we can cast them out.

I can`t bring myself now to watch PMQ's because it`s just pointless, all the lies and smears and still not been brought to account for it

Faith in UK politics has almost vanished, all the blows he has taken and he still stands.......beggars belief

He's only still standing because there's none in the Tory Party willing to stand against him, none want to deal with the mess he's created and many know he's their only meal ticket.

Most have zero morals and are willing to degrade themselves to keep favour. How anyone could vote for them is beyond me.
 
I dislike Boris Johnson immensely

But I’m increasingly finding some of the swearing and descriptive language I read on here distasteful.

Don’t throw insults. It debases your argument.

this post isn’t aimed at anyone in particular.
Nobody can swear on here.

But even if they could, some colourful language on a message board for a sports team from a working class town isn't worth worrying about compared to a litany of corruption, lies, decent and destruction of pur political system brought about by Johnson.

It's like complaining about graffiti in London during the blitz. We have bigger problems
 
I'm much more offended by Johnson and his actions that a bit of F***ing swearing, to be honest.
Which is fair enough.
Johnson offends me as well.
I wouldn’t call you scum, a scumbag or a Cnut or throw some other insult for not agreeing with me though.
 
Johnson, like Trump, is a psychopath. Once you realise this, none of his behaviour should come as a surprise.

What's probably more depressing is the number of people willing to defend that behaviour and how our so called "democracies" have allowed such people to end up being elected to the highest office.
exactly this it's all been there since day one:

Tell me which of these traits don't apply to him and I'm sure one of us can give you an example where they do:

  1. Superficially charming; “silver tongued”
  2. Self-absorbed and egocentric
  3. Easily bored, in need of constant stimulation
  4. Habitual liar
  5. Manipulative
  6. Shows no remorse; rationalizes wrongdoings, says people deserve it
  7. Shallow emotions
  8. Lacks empathy
  9. Exploits the goodwill of others especially financially
  10. Sexually promiscuous
  11. Impulsive
  12. Behaves recklessly
  13. Accepts no responsibility for actions
  14. Had behavior problems as a child
  15. Lacks inhibitions
  16. Has no long term goals
  17. Has many short term relationships
  18. No respect for authority, including the law
  19. Thinks they are never wrong
  20. May be highly intelligent, but has no conscience
Lets start with numbers 6 and 17: how many children? To how many women? Boris bruises with Arcuri, 3 marriages, an absolute minimum of 6 extra marital affairs, that are confirmed public knowledge and however many that are not.
 
The line was obviously rehearsed….Starmer himself mentioned it later during an interview, he was told by Tories that Johnson was advised not to use it.
So Johnson’s dropped his version of the Big Lie into the mix.
Now Tory mp’s, and ministers are lining up to not want to comment on it, but refusing outright to state the fact that it was a total and proven lie.
“….and so it goes”
 
Ian Blackford is remonstrated for saying Johnson mislead parliament. Johnson then misleadingly smears Starmer and Hoyle does zilch.
 
exactly this it's all been there since day one:

Tell me which of these traits don't apply to him and I'm sure one of us can give you an example where they do:

  1. Superficially charming; “silver tongued”
  2. Self-absorbed and egocentric
  3. Easily bored, in need of constant stimulation
  4. Habitual liar
  5. Manipulative
  6. Shows no remorse; rationalizes wrongdoings, says people deserve it
  7. Shallow emotions
  8. Lacks empathy
  9. Exploits the goodwill of others especially financially
  10. Sexually promiscuous
  11. Impulsive
  12. Behaves recklessly
  13. Accepts no responsibility for actions
  14. Had behavior problems as a child
  15. Lacks inhibitions
  16. Has no long term goals
  17. Has many short term relationships
  18. No respect for authority, including the law
  19. Thinks they are never wrong
  20. May be highly intelligent, but has no conscience
Lets start with numbers 6 and 17: how many children? To how many women? Boris bruises with Arcuri, 3 marriages, an absolute minimum of 6 extra marital affairs, that are confirmed public knowledge and however many that are not.
BloJo ticks every box apart from the last one 🙀
 
I called Johnson scum and I'd call him it to his face and to be honest, that's a pretty mild way of getting across how I feel about him.
I’m obviously interested to hear others viewpoints on this, hence I read the threads, but I really struggle to read posts that are full of anger and vitriol. And name calling and abuse. Sorry. Does nothing for the debate.

Guess I need to stay off the internet.
 
’Were not out of order’

WTAF?!
He’s a complete joke is Hoyle, absolutely pathetic speaker.
Not really sure what you would expect the speaker to do about this. Starmer did not raise a point of order, and it isn't the domain of the speaker to call out inacurate statements made in the house. He can only act if a point of order is raised.

Starmer may address this at PMQ's, but I am not sure he will, given his comments on the news this morning. I personaly think he should, but we'll see.
 
Not really sure what you would expect the speaker to do about this. Starmer did not raise a point of order, and it isn't the domain of the speaker to call out inacurate statements made in the house. He can only act if a point of order is raised.

Starmer may address this at PMQ's, but I am not sure he will, given his comments on the news this morning. I personaly think he should, but we'll see.
just go full on offensive on how many children he has, how he believes that spending money investigating old cases of pedophilia is spaffing money up the wall, and what exactly happened when he was found wandering disheveled around an Italian town after a bunga bunga party wat a billionaires pad and what photographic evidence might exist to leverage him to set fire to our country the way he has
 
just go full on offensive on how many children he has, how he believes that spending money investigating old cases of pedophilia is spaffing money up the wall, and what exactly happened when he was found wandering disheveled around an Italian town after a bunga bunga party wat a billionaires pad and what photographic evidence might exist to leverage him to set fire to our country the way he has
……not to mention pole dancers.
 
Back
Top