Liz Truss

newusername said:
We don't.
They can claim up to £25k p.a. in rent or £190/night for a hotel.

Recently read that in the US people elected to Congress & Senate can't claim housing expenses & so lots of them have beds in their offices.
All seems a bit 3rd world to me.
Click to expand...
It used to be the case so it must have been reformed during the expenses scandal
 
Trug said:
You make some good points Fragrance but why should the tax payer BUY their house for them and when they leave parliament sell it and keep all the proceeds. It must be cheaper to house MP's in a block of flats or even Buck house or any other royal residence owned by the tax payer than the present abuse ridden system
Click to expand...

A block of flats full of the people responsible for running the country...there are pretty good reasons why they don't do that.
 
The_Unicorn said:
According to one BBC report this morning there are already letters of 'no confidence' in her ready to be submitted should/when she wins tomorrow. Bad start and she could be gone by Xmas
Click to expand...
That would be so funny. Out as soon as she's in.

It's the correct thing to do though, she's a deranged lunatic, dangerous to the country, could will end up directly involving us in a war in Ukraine/Russia.

At the very least she has said she has no intention of helping people with their energy bills even as they hit 400+ per month. Obviously she will have to u turn on this but the fact she is too thick to grasp this is mind boggling.
 
When, not if she gets in be like putting your fingers through the dog shyte bag. Awful feeling that lingers long in the memory.
 
Clearly stating that she believes in the wealthy getting wealthier and is against redistribution of wealth.

Fair play to her, she's not trying to appeal to anyone but the very wealthiest. Surely can't be a vote winner though?

Can it?
 
Truss admits she's happy cutting taxes in favour of the rich. She doesn't agree with the redistribution of wealth or fairness. If you have more she will give you more.
 
Colgates_shaving_foam said:
Clearly stating that she believes in the wealthy getting wealthier and is against redistribution of wealth.

Fair play to her, she's not trying to appeal to anyone but the very wealthiest. Surely can't be a vote winner though?

Can it?
Click to expand...

No, that won't go down well with people on their asses with energy bills. It's a sure fire vote loser. I think she's pretty deluded.
 
Colgates_shaving_foam said:
Clearly stating that she believes in the wealthy getting wealthier and is against redistribution of wealth.

Fair play to her, she's not trying to appeal to anyone but the very wealthiest. Surely can't be a vote winner though?

Can it?
Click to expand...
It can for the tory Party members voting just now and thats all she cares about. Power
 
A politician with no moral or political beliefs ( was Lib Dem - Then not, was remain thrn not, was abolitionist then not etc) is as scary as they come.

As all she will do is appease the loudest voice in the room. As she has no core principles or beliefs to stick to.
 
If wasn’t so tragic it would be funny. Just watched her on the BBC.

Not making a political point, but how can people within the Tory party who are politically savvy put her forward as the PM to competently lead the country.

I doubt she will be in place this time next year.
 
Angus said:
If wasn’t so tragic it would be funny. Just watched her on the BBC.

Not making a political point, but how can people within the Tory party who are politically savvy put her forward as the PM to competently lead the country.

I doubt she will be in place this time next year.
Click to expand...
As I say the scary thing is that that do have deep political beliefs snd ideology will manipulate her to their whim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top