Ask that scoundrel running the firm and the hangers on who have made this happen.What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Too simplistic. Would you want to have been born a royal? No one would.1 down, numerous other benefit scrounges to go.
Its a start.
The witch hunt was carried out by his own family and hangers on. They're the ones who have made the decision to distance themselves from him.To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?
There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
Including the palace. Wonder if they have insider info.There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
No way would the Palace have stripped him if he was innocent. Not a chance. There is no institution in the Land that is tighter knit. Look how they closed ranks on Lady Di.To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?
There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
He isn't going to be convicted, the court may find for the plaintiff.To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?
There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
Basically jettisoning him so that they can claim plausible deniability.Strange timing from the firm?
To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?
There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
Good point, perhaps I have it the wrong way round and "The Firm" thinks that the Johnson thing will make this go away quickly?You reckon the Queen has thrown her favourite son out of the family in order to save that fat oaf ?
No, but if a person is born a royal, there is no compulsion for them to stay a royal.Too simplistic. Would you want to have been born a royal? No one would.
Others have named him as present at gatherings with under age girls. I'd have to watch a couple of documentaries again to remind myself whoTo put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?
There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.
Look at Zara Phillips and mike tindal to see that it can be doneNo, but if a person is born a royal, there is no compulsion for them to stay a royal.
And I would much prefer my taxes go to support the sick, unemployed, homeless, armed forces, social services, fire services, police, local authorities than to these self serving, scrounging, entitled sycophants.
FFS, no one can even join the armed forces unless they swear loyalty to the queen.
It's a civil case where the evidence threshold does not extend to forensics. There will be no plea or verdict but I'm guessing there may be an out of court settlement.To put the other side of this. What actual forensic or otherwise evidence is there to secure a conviction.
No DNA as far as I know
Someone who has already accepted money has got to be an unreliable witness.
Has anyone else made the same accusations against Andrew. to corroborate the story?
There is a bit of lynch mob mentality about this whole thing on here and elsewhere
Just what is the compelling evidence he is guilty.? Being stupid is not evidence.