indeedido
Well-known member
Jesus...Avocados.
No racism there?
Jesus...Avocados.
No racism there?
Why not cherry-pick the negative articles wrote about Kate when she first started seeing William and was constantly harassed by the paparazzi and press? Or the negative articles wrote about her family, or the lies posted by Tatler last year? It's easy to come to a conclusion and then find headlines to support a particular narrative as this article you've posted does, but it's very misleading and disingenuous.Tell me the ways in which she has behaved differently. And then once you have done that explain to me how those behaviour differences justify the differences in reporting that is clearly evident here:
Kate Versus Meghan – The Headline Comparisons Are Startling
When you put the headlines side-by-side, it's hard to ignore the fact that the media is far nicer to Kate, than they are to Meghan.www.2oceansvibe.com
Why not cherry-pick the negative articles wrote about Kate when she first started seeing William and was constantly harassed by the paparazzi and press? Or the negative articles wrote about her family, or the lies posted by Tatler last year? It's easy to come to a conclusion and then find headlines to support a particular narrative as this article you've posted does, but it's very misleading and disingenuous.
And neither is it entirely surprising that you could see somebody confusing you with Jesus.Indeedido, you are quite right that you don't report
Pursuing an idea and then finding anything to support it, whilst excluding everything that doesn't, most certainly is misleading and disingenuous. That's what Buzzfeed did.Indeedido, you are quite right that you don't report
It is neither misleading nor disingenuous. I suspected that might be the response. It is true that Kate has had negative articles written about her. Nobody denies that. But I wonder how that compares proportionately to Meghan:
Meghan Markle ‘gets twice as much negative press’ as Kate Middleton
Analysis supports argument Meghan has been highly criticised in the mediawww.independent.co.uk
Pursuing an idea and then finding anything to support it, whilst excluding everything that doesn't, most certainly is misleading and disingenuous. That's what Buzzfeed did.
And neither is it entirely surprising that you could see somebody confusing you with Jesus.
Indeedido, you are quite right that you don't report to me but don't bring Jesus into it. He's not likely to help.Jesus...
Not you, but Buzzfeed, like I said.Good job that's not what I am doing then really.
In what way...give real examples, and not how she has complained about how she has been treated, because that is the effect, not the cause.Of course she has been treated differently to Kate Middleton; she has acted and behaved very differently.
So she hasn't done anything bad, but she has wanted a bt of attention. How is that any different to the other royals. Cathryn and Will are constantly after attention. Parading their sprogs in the papers all the time for gods sake.I've never remotely mentioned "evil", but if you have missed the "look at me" behaviour then pointing it out will go straight past you too.
Crack on with your indignation.
He use to really like Trump, til Trump unfollowed him on twitterDidn't Piers Morgan used to really like Meghan....... but now he doesn't?
Wonder what happened there then
My goodness I think somebody needs to calm themselves down a bit, your bile is overflowing.So she hasn't done anything bad, but she has wanted a bt of attention. How is that any different to the other royals. Cathryn and Will are constantly after attention. Parading their sprogs in the papers all the time for gods sake.
If Harry and Megan haven't done anything evil, then maybe you need to point your hate to someone that has, say like Andrew the pedo, or how about the queen stopping laws for her own financial benefit or protecting her pedo son, or maybeCharles for wasting NHS money by pressuring to get homeopathy as a NHS therapy, denying funding for other things that might actually make a difference. That's where the hate needs to be.
Says the person who show anger at a couple that have no influence on your life and have left to live on another continent. At least my 'bile' overflows because of the material negative impact to my country and its people.My goodness I think somebody needs to calm themselves down a bit, your bile is overflowing.
or to put it another way, I see through the royal conbut you appear to have absolutely fixed views and bias.
Says the person who show anger at a couple that have no influence on your life and have left to live on another continent. At least my 'bile' overflows because of the material negative impact to my country and its people.
I'm not angry BoroMart, really I'm not.or to put it another way, I see through the royal con
Forgive me but pot, kettle.My goodness I think somebody needs to calm themselves down a bit, your bile is overflowing.
I don't hate people quite so easily as you appear, but I don't feel guilty not feeling sorry for the poor little couple cowering away from the nasty press while they court it like whores when it suits them.
I'm not blanket defending members of the Royal Family, nor anybody else who may be guilty of crime, but you appear to have absolutely fixed views and bias.
From the old stove himselfForgive me but pot, kettle.
It's not, it's bad for me, bad for all of usI'm not angry BoroMart, really I'm not.
As for a "Royal con"; good for you.
From the old stove himself