can we go and buy in whoever we like in January ?
asking for an agent
Quite a few want rid despite what he has done for the club, it’s madness.The man is an absolute star for this club and this town.
Can someone explain what these means in the most simplistic terms please? I mean, what does it actually mean? Does it mean the club can get the chequebook out again, like the old days? Can they spend that repayment money on players instead? Has the club got £107m to play with now?
It *feels* good but i genuinely have no idea if it’s good, brilliant, basic business practice, nowt to see here, etc.
By definition then it DOES mean something.It doesn't mean anything. It doesn't make the club any more, or less secure. The club owed Gibson O'Neil £107 million as a debt. The debt carried no interest. Now GON has decided to convert the debt into shares. So MFC no longer owes £107 million to GON. GON owns another 107 million shares (assuming they are £1 shares) in a company that is not really worth any more than it was yesterday.
It won't mean MFC has any more money. It may mean that MFC has a little more FFP headroom. I'm not sure MFC borrows money from third parties, but GON would still have to guarantee any loan because MFC won't have much of a credit rating.
Why has the loan been converted to equity? Anyone's guess really. HMRC might have insisted that it be done, on the basis that the debt was artificially affecting the value of GON. I don't think anyone seriously thought it would be repaid but it would have been on the GON balance sheet. It makes MFC look a bit more saleable, but in reality it's still a basket case. Or maybe Steve Gibson is preparing his own exit as chairman. Or maybe someone has made an offer to buy the business if it is debt free, or has reduced debt.
Others have said we borrow a sum equivalent to the transfer fee received for a player so we have the cash now, while the funder gets the instalments & a fee.I'm not sure MFC borrows money from third parties,
It still has the debt, just instead of it being a loan (with a 1 to 1 value) it is equity (with a 1 to a price value).with a fraction of its former debt.
He may well ask for it, but an investor wouldn't pay it yet.It still has the debt, just instead of it being a loan (with a 1 to 1 value) it is equity (with a 1 to a price value).
In your opinion, the value of the shares are a fraction of £1 but I bet if a billionaire rocked up to the Riverside & asked Gibson how much he'd be asking for £1+ per share back.
Not for medo people think he’s preparing to sell up?
The classic quote is "How do you make a small fortune out of owning a football club? Start with a large one."all championship clubs are currently loss making businesses, and almost all premier league clubs. So from that perspective, a football club is near impossible to value in the traditional business sense