Alwaysaborolad
Well-known member
He's probably right maybe he could score 100 out 100 against her, too be honest I'd never heard of Mary Earps, and wouldn't recognise her if she was sat in the same room as me, and that doesn't make me a pr*ck.
He's probably right maybe he could score 100 out 100 against her, too be honest I'd never heard of Mary Earps, and wouldn't recognise her if she was sat in the same room as me, and that doesn't make me a pr*ck.
poor mans Alan Thompson.. now a wannabe Lawrence Fox
He’s on a mad one. Comes across as a bit of a woke snowflake, playing the victim card
Christ!
Not a chance he'd score 100/100 against any pro keeper, male or female.He's probably right maybe he could score 100 out 100 against her, too be honest I'd never heard of Mary Earps, and wouldn't recognise her if she was sat in the same room as me, and that doesn't make me a pr*ck.
Joey Barton is most definitely a pr*ck though.He's probably right maybe he could score 100 out 100 against her, too be honest I'd never heard of Mary Earps, and wouldn't recognise her if she was sat in the same room as me, and that doesn't make me a pr*ck.
He's probably right maybe he could score 100 out 100 against her, too be honest I'd never heard of Mary Earps, and wouldn't recognise her if she was sat in the same room as me, and that doesn't make me a pr*ck.
I think his point is that he’s terrified of successful women. I can understand that attitude back in the eighties but this days it just makes him look a bit sad.What's his point though? Because of physiological factors men tend to be better at football than women, is anyone denying that? So what.
Does it decrease the achievements of elite athletes who have achieved a lot more than their male counterparts playing for England? Much, much more than Barton achieved.
I'd still bet good money he wouldn't score 100/100 against her though.I think his point is that he’s terrified of successful women. I can understand that attitude back in the eighties but this days it just makes him look a bit sad.
And you’re right, it’s a ridiculous comparison. Any sport could use that example and it would be equally ridiculous. To use rugby: Freddie Steward could break an Ellie Kildunne tackle 100 times out of 100. That doesn’t stop her being 6 nations and WXV champion this year and him, well, not
Not rude, but horrifically misogynistic.Well in that case atypical....
Hit him the head...hit him on the head...hit him on the head with a baseball bat keegan...keegan....
Always felt that chant was a little too passive aggressive by the Holgate.. some of the kater verses were verging on total rudeness
.
Where did that chant come from anyone know...he always seemed like a good guy...
I’m no tactical genius, but Mrs Ruthsayer is. Assess the opposition and tactics in the first five minutes. The rest of us (males) just nod as if we already knew.One of the replies pointed out he’d previously commented on women’s football and was inclined to tweet his opinions too…
Sort of shuts his point down pretty well.. (or enforces it )
I think someone having the opinion women aren’t the best qualified to comment on the men’s game is fine… but if they’re gonna air it in public like that then they need to prepare for a back lash…
What's his point though? Because of physiological factors men tend to be better at football than women, is anyone denying that? So what.
Does it decrease the achievements of elite athletes who have achieved a lot more than their male counterparts playing for England? Much, much more than Barton achieved.
I have no idea who this is, but i'm guessing it's another example of your completely shameless misogynistic posting on this boardI mean, while we're on the subject does anyone else change channel as soon as she comes on?
View attachment 69122