Well said Suella

newyddion said:
Yeah it’s our human rights that are our problem.. I’m so glad that we have corrupt politicians to point this out! Well said indeed! Get rid of these pesky ‘laws’ that are stopping our politicians from doing the things they want to do.. give them more power.. politicians through time and across the world always do better with more power!

Get back snowflake wokefaces are sovereignty is at risk, take back are country again.

Get Brexit Done
Stop the Boats..
then..
erm
another solution perhaps?
a big one!
one last.. solution?

When ‘they’ say they are taking back power.. they mean for themselves! THEIR country

and we just handed it over to some scruffy lying tramp who hid in a fridge! baffled by boffle.

What a time to be alive!
Click to expand...
‘Scruffy lying tramp’ - looking at the state of him at that Covid inquiry yesterday I think you are being very kind to him.
 
They are giving ministers the right to ignore law!

Anyone who thinks that is a good idea needs to give their head shake and hopefully never procreate.

In history how often has that kind of power in the hands of the ruling class worked out well for anyone?

This is a slippery slope to fascism.
 
SilentProf said:
No, people granted asylum while in Rwanda would be kept in Rwanda. They were never due to be transported back here.
Click to expand...
We are some Rwandan refugees back this way but those sent there by us do not come back.

100s of millions spent and the scheme would only take a few hundred anyway, it's a nothing policy that needs us to hand power to MPs to ignore human Rights laws.

How is this a good plan in anyway shape or form?
 
Rofesleg said:
What is the reason for the banishment? Didn't Stafford just paste a quote from Braverman with a suggestion they agreed with her?

If the thread title was 'Suella said this' with no opinion expressed, or, 'Suella is evil for saying this', would they still have been banned?
If not, then it looks like the ban is purely because Stafford agrees with an opinion unpopular with other posters.

Is that the way it is now? If someone else agrees with Braverman will they be banned as well? A dangerous way to go if you ask me.

h_m_boro's post was probably the most appropriate response. Said it all without the drama: 'Nobody, ever, has said "Well done Suella"
Big silly.'
Click to expand...

See Rule 2.
 
Bet you love a curry, sitting on your Ikea chair, drinking your German beer, watching TV on your Japanese television, writing on this message board using your Chinese made phone, sitting in clothes made in India, walking around in shoes made in Pakistan, getting in your French car to go to the hospital to be treated by a Romanian nurse.
 
JonnyHistory said:
We are some Rwandan refugees back this way but those sent there by us do not come back.

100s of millions spent and the scheme would only take a few hundred anyway, it's a nothing policy that needs us to hand power to MPs to ignore human Rights laws.

How is this a good plan in anyway shape or form?
Click to expand...
It’s not. It’s disgraceful pandering to the hard right.
 
Stafford said:
“The same human rights framework is producing insanities…foreign terrorists we can’t deport because of their human rights. Terrorists we have to let back in because of their human rights. Foreign rapists and paedophiles who should have been removed are let back into the community only to reoffend, yep because of their human rights.”
Click to expand...
Another racist, bigoted Tory in our ranks, hopefully we will soon see the back of such cretinous posters.
 
I think we can all agree that we all want less human rights. I for one, have far too many. I would love it if the current government were given carte blanche to do whatever they want to me irrespective of the laws on human rights.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top