What an absolute šŸ›Ž end

Makes me wonderā€¦ who printed that on the shirt for him?

Edit: this is not meant to be looking for an excuse, rather wondering if a club shop printed it and how if they did, they could be so oblivious.
 
Pretty sick for a football fan of any club to wear something like that and Iā€™m surprised the police got to him before he got filled in!

What exactly is he getting arrested for? what would be the charge?
 
boringblock_21 said:
Makes me wonderā€¦ who printed that on the shirt for him?

Edit: this is not meant to be looking for an excuse, rather wondering if a club shop printed it and how if they did, they could be so oblivious.
Click to expand...

I guess that people that work in club shops tend to be younger, and they're probably printing lots of stupid **** at any given time because of how popular Man United are and how daft some people are.

I'll be honest, I didn't immediately make the connection, though the "name" was an obvious red flag.
 
Hopefully will be treated as a hate crime.

I canā€™t believe he made it to the stadium without someone kicking his head in
 
newyddion said:
Pretty sick for a football fan of any club to wear something like that and Iā€™m surprised the police got to him before he got filled in!

What exactly is he getting arrested for? what would be the charge?
Click to expand...
Going equipped to incite a riot perhaps?šŸ¤”

As for who printed the shirt, it could have been some stallowner who wasn't even in the UK 15 years ago, never mind when Hillsborough happened. So wouldn't have had the faintest clue of the relevance.
 
Ipad1977 said:
Going equipped to incite a riot perhaps?šŸ¤”

As for who printed the shirt, it could have been some stallowner who wasn't even in the UK 15 years ago, never mind when Hillsborough happened. So wouldn't have had the faintest clue of the relevance.
Click to expand...
Itā€™s crazy that a t-shirt can be illegal.. no matter how offensive.

Iā€™d be surprised is the person putting on the letters and numbers knew what it meant.
 
Whatā€™s infuriating is this complete cretin will have thought he was really cool and edgy, I wish a couple of lads had gotten a hold of him before the bobbies
 
It could, and I heavily stress the word could, be a reference to the season when Liverpool only lost one game, got 97 points but City still won the title and as such ā€œnot enoughā€ points to win the title.

Probably isnā€™t though.
 
Aet290204 said:
It could, and I heavily stress the word could, be a reference to the season when Liverpool only lost one game, got 97 points but City still won the title and as such ā€œnot enoughā€ points to win the title.

Probably isnā€™t though.
Click to expand...
That argument would hold up in court aswell, are you a solicitor?
 
Aet290204 said:
It could, and I heavily stress the word could, be a reference to the season when Liverpool only lost one game, got 97 points but City still won the title and as such ā€œnot enoughā€ points to win the title.

Probably isnā€™t though.
Click to expand...
It's absolutely not. You should delete this post AET, there isn't any ambiguity in the meaning. It's a disgrace, not even open for discussion.
 
Kowalski said:
It's absolutely not. You should delete this post AET, there isn't any ambiguity in the meaning. It's a disgrace, not even open for discussion.
Click to expand...
Gosh what an over reaction.
Iā€™m not defending him.
Just saying itā€™s open to interpretation.
Absolutely not deleting any comments

What on earth do you think the ā€œprobably isnā€™t thoughā€ bit at then end of the post meant ???

sheesh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top