The_Lizards_Jumpers
Well-known member
Just wondering how it differs from Warnock, and Pulis?
Points per game is one measure of success.
But don't forget to factor in the squad each manager inherited.
Without even looking at the stats I'd expect Pulis to come out on top in points per game given the players he had at his disposal.
Yeah fair point and Woodgate to come out worsePoints per game is one measure of success.
But don't forget to factor in the squad each manager inherited.
Without even looking at the stats I'd expect Pulis to come out on top in points per game given the players he had at his disposal.
Interesting choice of words.Thanks, so worse than Pulis and slightly better than Woodgate - interesting.
Interesting phrase "slightly better than Woodgate" when the points per game for Warnock in right in the middle of both Pulis and Woodgate, i.e he is 0.31 points per game worse than Pulis and 0.31 points per game better the Woodgate.Thanks, so worse than Pulis and slightly better than Woodgate - interesting.
Also if you use percentages he's closer to Pulis than he is to Woodgate.Interesting phrase "slightly better than Woodgate" when the points per game for Warnock in right in the middle of both Pulis and Woodgate, i.e he is 0.31 points per game worse than Pulis and 0.31 points per game better the Woodgate.
BTW that was just an observation, I am indifferent to whether he stays or go's as I can't see anything changing this season regardless of who is in charge.
Because the league table is based on 3 points for a win, 1 for a draw, with teams separated by goal difference if level on points....and the excuses start.
Why doesn't the league table reflect these other measures of success ?
Why though, if "Points per game is one measure of success" why don't the authorities reflect these other measures ?Because the league table is based on 3 points for a win, 1 for a draw, with teams separated by goal difference if level on points.
You'd have been happy for us to have been relegated to League One?I would have been happy for Woody to have been given longer myself, same with Monks
I would have been happy for Woody to have been given longer myself, same with Monks
If it's league tables you like as a measure, Pulis finished 7th in his last season, Warnock 10th in his full season, Woodgate sacked in 21st....and the excuses start.
Why doesn't the league table reflect these other measures of success ?
Woodgate - W9 D14 L16, 1.08 ppg.
Warnock - W24 D13 L26, 1.35 ppg
Nowhere near Woodgate yet, but that's admittedly heavily bouyed by 2020.
We're at 1 ppg for this season, and 1.14 ppg for 2021.